H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Michiel Schapers H2H: 1-1
Jim Grabb and Michiel Schapers are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michiel Schapers won the 1988 Cincinnati second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 66
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1988* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Michiel Schapers | 6-3 7-5 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1987* | Seoul | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Jim Grabb | 6-3 6-3 | Michiel Schapers | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Michiel Schapers | #1,230 | #25 | 606 | 1,841 | 151 | 176 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Michiel Schapers | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #95 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #78 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #105 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #49 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #50 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #79 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #169 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #85 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #103 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #270 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |