H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Neil Borwick H2H: 0-1

Neil Borwick holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neil Borwick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Neil Borwick won the 1993 Japan Open round of 64 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Neil Borwick
AUS Age 58 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neil Borwick #174 6-1 6-1 Jim Grabb #53 Match data Apr 7, 1993* R64 Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Neil Borwick #1,150 #104 441 1,662 25 50 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Neil Borwick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% #506 1,493 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1988 1–1 50.0% #597 1,497 0 0
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #162 1,486 0 0
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1990 1–4 20.0% #189 1,482 0 0
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1991 2–8 20.0% #173 1,450 0 0
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1992 7–5 58.3% #176 1,555 0 0
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1993 13–15 46.4% #112 1,628 0 0
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1994 1–14 6.7% #242 1,460 0 0
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1995 0–1 0.0% #400 1,444 0 0
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Neil Borwick
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1993 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 0 10 10 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1995 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 19 34 53 35.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 169/198 of Jim Grabb's and 61/66 of Neil Borwick's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Grabb Neil Borwick
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 10/10 4.8 2.5 60.9% 65.7% 55.9% 55.6% 23.0% 61.6% 33.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 12/12 4.9 1.6 67.5% 71.7% 49.5% 52.0% 34.9% 64.1% 33.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 24/28 7.2 3.0 64.6% 73.0% 46.7% 60.9% 47.5% 64.0% 37.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 14/15 3.9 2.9 64.4% 63.8% 46.3% 55.9% 22.4% 57.7% 29.6%
27 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3% 1995 1/1 4.0 3.0 70.9% 55.7% 40.0% 44.4% 0.0% 51.2% 27.4%
28 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2% — 61/75 5.6 2.6 64.6% 69.2% 48.6% 56.9% 34.5% 62.0% 33.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Neil Borwick
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1493 102.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1497 100.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.15
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1989 1487 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.01
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1990 1482 107.2 — — — — +50 — — 25.0% -1.75 — — — -0.24
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1991 1451 110.2 -1.64 -1.98 0.867 47.8% +37 — — 30.4% -0.83 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.43
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1992 1556 115.3 +0.44 -2.86 0.919 48.6% -9 — +53 55.2% -0.17 3–2 (60%) 5–1 (83%) — +0.81
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1993 1629 133.0 +1.41 -0.53 1.029 50.7% +23 — -69 44.1% +0.02 5–4 (56%) 4–9 (31%) — +0.31
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1994 1460 99.4 -3.82 -4.41 0.701 44.4% +9 — — 17.6% -2.15 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.74
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 1995 1444 94.4 -3.26 -1.55 0.561 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.09
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1663 119.9 -0.56 -2.13 0.888 48.2% +20 — +1 36.5% -0.75 9–14 (39%) 13–14 (48%) 99.0 +2.97

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.