H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Paolo Cane H2H: 1-1

Jim Grabb and Paolo Cane are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on clay, while Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1992 Charlotte round of 32 6-4 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Paolo Cane
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Grabb #75 6-4 4-6 6-3 Paolo Cane #114 Match data May 7, 1992* R32 Charlotte ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Paolo Cane #44 6-1 6-4 Jim Grabb #93 Match data Feb 18, 1987* R64 Indian Wells Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Paolo Cane #1,381 #26 565 1,853 124 123 50.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Paolo Cane
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–4 20.0% — 1,482 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 0–2 0.0% #555 1,457 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1985 2–5 28.6% #199 1,450 0 0
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1986 23–14 62.2% #44 1,668 0 1
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1987 20–16 55.6% #51 1,706 0 1
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1988 15–18 45.5% #81 1,704 0 1
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1989 24–14 63.2% #33 1,756 0 2
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1990 15–16 48.4% #109 1,688 0 2
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1991 8–6 57.1% #122 1,688 0 3
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1992 7–10 41.2% #163 1,656 0 3
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 1993 3–7 30.0% #177 1,598 0 3
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1994 6–10 37.5% #145 1,600 0 3
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 1995 0–1 0.0% #635 1,583 0 3
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Paolo Cane
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1988 9 6 15 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1993 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 — — — — 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 20 21 41 48.8% 87 79 166 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 169/198 of Jim Grabb's and 51/58 of Paolo Cane's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Grabb Paolo Cane
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 10/14 6.3 1.3 51.0% 71.3% 51.5% 63.4% 48.6% 62.1% 39.8%
27 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3% 1992 16/17 5.7 2.2 54.6% 71.3% 51.8% 56.6% 36.8% 62.4% 37.4%
28 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6% 1993 9/10 5.7 2.2 52.2% 72.0% 45.6% 58.6% 33.5% 59.7% 37.1%
29 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2% 1994 15/16 3.9 2.0 48.5% 66.8% 47.1% 55.9% 42.1% 56.5% 38.4%
30 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7% 1995 1/1 4.0 1.0 45.5% 50.0% 37.5% 44.4% — 43.2% 20.0%
31 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2% — 51/247 5.3 1.9 51.5% 69.7% 49.0% 57.8% 39.3% 59.8% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Paolo Cane
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1482 102.2 — — — — +62 — — 30.8% -1.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.46
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1457 100.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.28
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1451 106.2 — — — — — -2 — 35.3% -0.76 0–2 0–1 — +0.43
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1986 1668 140.6 — — — — -133 +42 — 56.8% +0.29 13–8 (62%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.85
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1987 1706 138.9 — — — — -92 +43 — 51.0% +0.05 8–4 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.47
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1988 1705 131.4 — — — — +2 -25 — 45.7% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.73
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1989 1756 138.8 — — — — -79 +94 — 57.8% +0.27 9–1 (90%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.63
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1990 1689 130.4 — — — — +19 +67 — 48.6% -0.24 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.16
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1991 1689 122.0 +0.78 +0.31 1.049 51.3% -42 +118 — 55.9% +0.38 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.45
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 1992 1657 119.9 +0.98 -1.30 0.996 49.7% -14 +70 — 45.2% -0.12 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.12
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 1993 1599 109.2 -0.36 -0.69 0.919 48.3% +27 +55 — 38.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.35
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 1994 1601 126.5 -2.00 -0.22 0.884 47.5% — +49 — 36.1% -1.08 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.94
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 1995 1583 93.4 -0.27 -2.52 0.352 32.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.09
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1854 137.8 -0.20 -0.58 0.939 48.8% -32 +51 — 49.0% -0.14 52–39 (57%) 46–43 (52%) 106.8 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.