H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 2-1
Jim Grabb holds a 2–1 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 2–0 on carpet, while Patrik Kuhnen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1992 Taipei semifinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 60
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1992* | Taipei | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 6-3 6-1 | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1991* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 6-4 6-4 | Patrik Kuhnen | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Patrik Kuhnen | 6-1 6-4 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Patrik Kuhnen | #1,341 | #43 | 574 | 1,787 | 126 | 151 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Patrik Kuhnen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #170 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #83 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #61 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #69 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #82 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #86 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #89 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #119 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #189 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #187 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #504 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |