H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Ramesh Krishnan H2H: 0-2

Ramesh Krishnan holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ramesh Krishnan leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ramesh Krishnan won the 1989 ASB Classic quarterfinal 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Ramesh Krishnan
IND Age 65 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ramesh Krishnan 7-5 6-0 Jim Grabb #98 Match data Jan 14, 1989* QF ASB Classic ATP 250 Hard
Ramesh Krishnan 6-3 6-4 Jim Grabb #90 Match data Nov 20, 1986* R32 Houston ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ramesh Krishnan — — — 1,892 278 249 52.8% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Ramesh Krishnan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 6–5 54.5% — 1,537 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1979 7–12 36.8% — 1,584 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1980 14–11 56.0% — 1,713 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1981 13–16 44.8% — 1,755 0 1
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1982 22–23 48.9% — 1,741 0 2
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1983 20–21 48.8% — 1,749 0 2
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1984 31–19 62.0% — 1,842 0 3
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1985 23–21 52.3% — 1,805 0 3
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1986 29–22 56.9% — 1,845 0 5
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1987 29–22 56.9% — 1,790 0 5
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1988 28–15 65.1% — 1,757 0 6
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 1989 21–17 55.3% — 1,717 0 7
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1990 20–21 48.8% — 1,698 0 8
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 1991 9–16 36.0% — 1,583 0 8
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 1992 4–5 44.4% — 1,616 0 8
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 1993 2–2 50.0% — 1,639 0 8
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Ramesh Krishnan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 3 1 4 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 7 7 14 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 7 8 15 46.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1984 15 7 22 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1985 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 7 14 50.0%
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1986 17 8 25 68.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1988 21 11 32 65.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1989 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 157 119 276 56.9% 33 53 86 38.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 46 44 90 51.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Ramesh Krishnan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1486 97.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1537 115.0 — — — — +60 +16 — 54.5% +0.18 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1584 128.8 — — — — +55 -24 — 39.6% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.61
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1713 127.2 — — — — -22 -93 -153 50.8% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.73
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1755 140.6 — — — — +40 -135 — 45.1% -0.38 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.22
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1982 1742 139.3 — — — — +1 -23 -190 47.3% -0.16 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.02
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1983 1749 145.4 — — — — +29 -115 -80 49.0% +0.04 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.76
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1984 1843 148.4 — — — — +35 -224 -106 58.9% +0.72 11–6 (65%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.71
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1985 1806 149.5 — — — — -2 — +12 50.5% +0.04 10–6 (63%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.37
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1986 1846 139.6 — — — — +4 -288 +69 58.3% +0.70 7–10 (41%) 4–8 (33%) — +1.08
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1987 1790 139.1 — — — — +43 — +30 56.5% +0.43 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.98
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 1988 1758 134.4 — — — — +24 — +34 60.2% +0.74 9–7 (56%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.37
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 1989 1717 136.6 — — — — +43 — — 54.4% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.03
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 1990 1699 138.1 — — — — +21 — +16 50.0% +0.07 8–10 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.38
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 1991 1583 123.4 — — — — -2 — — 41.0% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.16
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 1992 1616 131.3 — — — — +7 — — 40.9% -0.23 2–0 1–0 — -0.81
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 1993 1640 118.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.13 0–2 — — -0.39
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1893 146.4 — — — — +22 -91 -23 52.1% +0.18 89–85 (51%) 69–75 (48%) 97.4 -0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.