H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Robert Vant Hof H2H: 0-1

Robert Vant Hof holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Robert Vant Hof leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robert Vant Hof won the 1988 Japan Open round of 32 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Robert Vant Hof
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Robert Vant Hof 6-2 6-1 Jim Grabb Match data Apr 14, 1988* R32 Japan Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Robert Vant Hof — — — 1,879 — — — 0 0 0 0 2 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Jim Grabb Robert Vant Hof
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 — — — — — — —
1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 — — — — — — —
1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 — — — — — — —
1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 — — — — — — —
1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 — — — — — — —
1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 — — — — — — —
1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 — — — — — — —
1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Jim Grabb Robert Vant Hof
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1980 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1981 4 7 11 36.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1984 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% Career 42 43 85 49.4% 9 16 25 36.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 15 25 40 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Jim Grabb Robert Vant Hof
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1978 1492 112.1 — — — — — +23 — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.05
1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 +0.05 1979 1507 114.7 — — — — — — — 36.4% -1.09 0–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.60
1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) 107.9 +1.31 1980 1593 123.7 — — — — -2 -34 -56 46.0% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–4 (67%) 104.7 +1.15
1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -0.31 1981 1667 131.2 — — — — +13 -127 -104 43.0% -0.43 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 97.9 -0.32
1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) 100.2 -1.18 1982 1691 125.8 — — — — +19 -146 — 54.2% +0.33 6–2 (75%) 7–5 (58%) 105.0 +3.05
1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) 98.1 -0.10 1983 1722 139.5 — — — — -34 — -63 48.6% -0.15 8–3 (73%) 8–6 (57%) 107.1 -1.98
1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) 91.2 +0.72 1984 1580 107.4 — — — — -11 — +27 34.0% -0.87 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 +0.46
1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) 105.6 +1.42 1985 1520 97.1 — — — — +10 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.84
1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 97.3 +0.36 1987 1498 104.8 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.86 0–1 — — -0.12
1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) 98.4 +0.09 1988 1524 125.6 — — — — +5 — — 35.7% -0.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.53
1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -1.25 1989 1555 113.9 — — — — +30 — -5 48.1% -0.37 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) 99.0 +0.26
1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 98.0 +0.17 1990 1536 95.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.20
1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 Career 1880 131.6 — — — — 0 -86 -41 44.1% -0.42 29–29 (50%) 38–34 (53%) 102.6 +1.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.