H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 1-0

Jim Grabb holds a 1–0 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1994 Canadian Open round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sebastien Lareau
CAN Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Grabb #122 6-4 6-2 Sebastien Lareau #132 Match data Jul 27, 1994* R64 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Sebastien Lareau #1,018 #76 622 1,720 83 122 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Sebastien Lareau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–1 50.0% #349 1,505 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 1–2 33.3% #197 1,501 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1993 2–3 40.0% #131 1,531 0 0
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1994 3–13 18.8% #119 1,482 0 0
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1995 12–17 41.4% #136 1,557 0 0
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1996 15–15 50.0% #105 1,676 0 0
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1997 8–15 34.8% #187 1,591 0 0
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1998 19–19 50.0% #79 1,657 0 0
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1999 12–18 40.0% #102 1,616 0 0
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 2000 5–11 31.2% #124 1,597 0 0
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 2001 5–7 41.7% #229 1,522 0 0
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Sebastien Lareau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1996 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1999 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 57 80 137 41.6% 1 9 10 10.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 169/198 of Jim Grabb's and 180/204 of Sebastien Lareau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Grabb Sebastien Lareau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 2/2 13.0 6.5 44.7% 74.2% 46.6% 49.3% 21.8% 58.6% 38.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 3/3 3.0 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 47.5% 71.6% 33.3% 60.1% 43.6%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 2/5 6.5 12.0 49.5% 67.9% 34.2% 35.0% 40.3% 51.0% 33.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 14/16 7.1 6.0 54.3% 71.6% 41.9% 59.4% 34.6% 58.4% 35.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 28/29 8.4 5.7 56.5% 76.7% 43.5% 58.3% 37.7% 62.2% 36.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 26/30 6.1 4.0 59.9% 71.5% 50.8% 64.3% 47.9% 63.2% 39.9%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 23/23 3.8 6.1 61.6% 68.4% 40.6% 53.6% 40.6% 57.7% 38.5%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 32/38 7.6 3.8 66.4% 70.8% 45.2% 63.1% 40.7% 62.4% 37.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 25/30 6.4 3.0 61.4% 69.6% 51.7% 65.1% 48.9% 62.4% 35.8%
27 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3% 2000 13/16 6.2 3.8 62.2% 67.8% 49.9% 56.8% 39.7% 60.7% 35.5%
28 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6% 2001 12/12 4.4 3.0 61.3% 68.4% 46.5% 53.3% 34.0% 60.1% 33.5%
29 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2% — 180/205 6.5 4.5 60.5% 71.0% 46.1% 59.9% 41.1% 61.1% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Sebastien Lareau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1494 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1505 103.4 +1.23 -0.86 0.927 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1502 106.2 -0.04 +0.85 1.094 50.9% +40 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1531 110.6 -0.23 +0.55 0.687 43.1% — — +53 35.7% -1.21 1–0 2–0 — -0.06
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1994 1482 116.2 -2.66 -0.77 0.864 47.4% +32 — — 26.8% -1.29 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 +0.37
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 +0.05 1995 1558 135.8 +0.09 -0.30 0.971 49.2% +40 — -29 40.8% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 97.8 -0.07
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) 107.9 +1.31 1996 1677 142.6 +0.84 +2.33 1.084 51.2% -11 — -78 51.5% +0.25 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -1.30
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 100.0 -0.31 1997 1591 120.1 -2.53 +0.23 0.910 48.2% +7 -69 +10 35.7% -0.84 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 99.1 -0.18
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) 100.2 -1.18 1998 1658 133.0 +0.45 +0.31 1.002 49.8% +23 — -40 51.5% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +0.89
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) 98.1 -0.10 1999 1617 128.1 +0.03 -1.37 0.950 49.1% +16 — +14 41.3% -0.45 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 100.5 +1.09
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) 91.2 +0.72 2000 1598 117.1 -1.05 -1.01 0.904 48.4% +32 — +5 40.9% -0.57 0–5 (0%) 4–5 (44%) 94.2 +0.40
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) 105.6 +1.42 2001 1522 107.8 -0.57 -2.57 0.841 47.2% +60 — — 39.3% -0.89 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.82
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 97.3 +0.36 2002 1503 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) 98.4 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) 91.9 -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 98.0 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1721 133.2 -0.41 -0.11 0.955 49.1% +21 -69 -10 42.5% -0.47 25–35 (42%) 43–47 (48%) 100.9 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.