H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Simon Youl H2H: 1-2
Simon Youl holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Simon Youl leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1992 Brisbane fourth round 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1992* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Simon Youl | Match data |
| Apr 4, 1992* | Singapore | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Simon Youl | 6-3 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1988* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Simon Youl | 4-6 7-5 6-3 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Simon Youl | #1,263 | #80 | 474 | 1,704 | 91 | 140 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Simon Youl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #450 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #201 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #90 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #121 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #109 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #156 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #140 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #94 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #200 | 1,444 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,443 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |