H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jim Grabb vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 1-1

Jim Grabb and Thomas Hogstedt are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jim Grabb leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1991 Paris Masters round of 64 3-6 7-5 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Thomas Hogstedt
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Hogstedt #150 3-6 7-5 7-6(2) Jim Grabb #97 Match data Oct 30, 1991* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Jim Grabb #88 7-6 7-6 Thomas Hogstedt #165 Match data Nov 4, 1987* R64 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Thomas Hogstedt #1,032 #38 413 1,736 90 153 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Grabb Thomas Hogstedt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1979 1–1 50.0% #368 1,521 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 9–10 47.4% #82 1,589 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1983 15–16 48.4% #63 1,690 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1984 10–16 38.5% #84 1,639 0 1
21 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0 1985 3–10 23.1% #210 1,520 0 1
22 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0 1986 2–8 20.0% #124 1,504 0 1
23 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1 1987 8–15 34.8% #179 1,495 0 1
24 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,511 0 1
25 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1 1989 8–10 44.4% #133 1,607 0 1
26 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1 1990 12–26 31.6% #91 1,507 0 1
27 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1 1991 11–23 32.4% #130 1,537 0 1
28 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2 1992 5–8 38.5% #181 1,559 0 1
29 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2 1993 0–2 0.0% #306 1,541 0 1
30 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2 1994 2–3 40.0% #309 1,555 0 1
31 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Grabb Thomas Hogstedt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
21 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 5 16 21 23.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
27 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1991 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
28 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 1992 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4% — 47 83 130 36.2% 9 24 33 27.3% 2 9 11 18.2% 32 37 69 46.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 169/198 of Jim Grabb's and 45/54 of Thomas Hogstedt's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Grabb Thomas Hogstedt
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 37/42 7.0 4.0 64.9% 72.2% 48.6% 59.8% 37.6% 64.1% 36.3% 1991 28/34 4.1 3.5 51.7% 67.9% 46.3% 50.1% 44.9% 57.3% 35.0%
28 1992 50/55 6.4 3.1 64.6% 75.8% 47.8% 54.4% 35.0% 66.0% 35.6% 1992 10/13 4.8 4.6 51.4% 65.6% 47.6% 52.6% 56.3% 56.8% 35.3%
29 1993 13/15 5.1 3.0 70.6% 65.7% 48.5% 60.1% 52.2% 59.9% 35.2% 1993 2/2 6.5 6.0 44.7% 63.3% 30.7% 35.6% 53.6% 45.4% 34.6%
30 1994 33/38 5.2 3.0 68.5% 69.1% 45.9% 59.0% 49.0% 61.9% 35.7% 1994 5/5 3.8 2.2 53.9% 66.9% 53.5% 34.1% 45.5% 60.5% 33.3%
31 1995 20/23 5.7 2.9 64.8% 68.9% 47.3% 65.1% 27.2% 61.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 10/16 7.1 5.5 65.1% 74.5% 44.0% 58.1% 52.2% 63.5% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 6/9 4.3 6.5 63.9% 71.6% 34.5% 48.0% 42.7% 58.1% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 169/378 6.1 3.5 65.9% 71.9% 46.9% 58.2% 40.0% 63.3% 35.2% — 45/243 4.3 3.7 51.6% 67.1% 46.7% 48.3% 47.9% 57.0% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Grabb Thomas Hogstedt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1521 109.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — -0.23
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1539 106.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 — 0–1 — +0.17
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1590 118.6 — — — — +14 -47 — 48.9% -0.06 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.74
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1691 138.1 — — — — +29 -141 — 51.2% -0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–6 (54%) — +0.67
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1639 130.8 — — — — +45 -131 — 42.2% -0.53 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.47
21 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16 1985 1521 106.8 — — — — +9 — — 28.1% -0.88 2–3 (40%) 0–6 (0%) — +1.64
22 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05 1986 1504 117.7 — — — — +11 -6 — 21.7% -1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.27
23 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31 1987 1495 116.9 — — — — +33 -27 — 35.7% -1.22 4–3 (57%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.07
24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31 1988 1512 109.5 — — — — +25 — — 44.4% -0.61 1–1 0–1 — +0.37
25 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18 1989 1608 120.3 — — — — -7 — — 43.2% -0.91 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.52
26 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 1990 1508 117.7 — — — — +38 — +6 37.2% -0.67 6–10 (38%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.36
27 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72 1991 1538 127.2 -2.85 -2.49 0.820 46.5% +39 — — 38.4% -0.93 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) — -0.11
28 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42 1992 1559 120.6 -2.70 -1.47 0.819 46.4% +35 — — 39.4% -1.09 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.16
29 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36 1993 1541 99.0 -2.06 +0.48 0.633 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
30 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09 1994 1556 115.0 -1.47 +0.36 0.841 47.2% +11 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
31 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43 — 1737 130.3 -2.63 -1.81 0.811 46.3% +28 -74 +6 40.4% -0.73 37–44 (46%) 42–54 (44%) 100.1 +2.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.