H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Grabb vs Tim Mayotte H2H: 2-1
Jim Grabb holds a 2–1 lead over Tim Mayotte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1991 Moscow third round 3-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 1991* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Tim Mayotte | Match data |
| Sep 29, 1989* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jim Grabb | 4-6 6-3 7-5 | Tim Mayotte | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1988* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Tim Mayotte | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Jim Grabb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Grabb | Tim Mayotte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |