H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jim Osborne vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 1-1

Jim Osborne and Andres Gimeno are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andres Gimeno leads 1–0 on grass, while Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1969 Los Angeles Open round of 32 1-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Osborne
USA Age 81 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Andres Gimeno
ESP Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Osborne 1-6 7-5 6-4 Andres Gimeno Match data Sep 23, 1969* R32 Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Andres Gimeno 6-2 6-3 Jim Osborne Match data Jun 19, 1968* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Osborne #831 #211 0 1,811 118 121 49.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Andres Gimeno #150 #49 0 2,044 246 131 65.3% 1 0 0 0 9 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Osborne Andres Gimeno
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1968 35–24 59.3% — 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1969 29–17 63.0% — 1,743 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1970 26–29 47.3% — 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1971 15–19 44.1% — 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1972 8–20 28.6% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1973 0–4 0.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1974 3–2 60.0% #228 1,553 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,550 0 0 1968 48–27 64.0% — 1,755 0 1
31 1976 2–2 50.0% #211 1,575 0 0 1969 47–21 69.1% — 1,931 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1970 41–25 62.1% — 1,885 0 5
33 1978 0–1 0.0% #465 1,573 0 0 1971 45–26 63.4% — 1,930 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1972 53–23 69.7% — 1,916 1 10
35 — — — — — — — 1973 11–8 57.9% #136 1,810 1 10
36 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0 1974 1–1 50.0% #150 1,789 1 10
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Osborne Andres Gimeno
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 1968 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1969 8 5 13 61.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1971 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1973 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1974 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 17 7 24 70.8% 21 12 33 63.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1969 10 6 16 62.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 15 7 22 68.2% 9 3 12 75.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 10 8 18 55.6% 8 4 12 66.7% 11 4 15 73.3% 12 9 21 57.1%
33 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 14 9 23 60.9% 19 7 26 73.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 7 15 53.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 16 8 24 66.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 7 15 53.3%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
36 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
37 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 55 110 50.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 17 19 36 47.2% — 67 38 105 63.8% 91 42 133 68.4% 48 21 69 69.6% 40 30 70 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Osborne Andres Gimeno
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 1968 1634 115.0 — — — — +73 -103 -46 57.0% +0.47 7–9 (44%) — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1969 1744 126.2 — — — — +78 -108 -67 58.3% +0.69 8–2 (80%) — — +1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1970 1665 122.6 — — — — +52 -115 +4 46.3% -0.07 9–10 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 98.7 +2.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1971 1717 116.9 — — — — -83 -182 +67 49.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 101.5 +0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1972 1525 122.6 — — — — +64 -28 +142 38.9% -0.29 1–10 (9%) 1–12 (8%) 81.7 +1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1973 1501 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 11.1% -1.67 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1974 1553 112.6 — — — — +29 — — 58.3% +0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1975 1550 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.16 1968 1756 123.0 — — — — -44 -36 -165 61.2% +0.85 13–13 (50%) — — -1.68
31 1976 1576 112.5 — — — — +12 — — 50.0% +0.17 2–2 (50%) — — -0.11 1969 1932 142.4 — — — — -16 -12 -127 64.2% +1.04 14–7 (67%) — — -4.00
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1885 146.9 — — — — +13 -14 +43 59.9% +0.84 11–9 (55%) 0–4 (0%) 97.5 -4.73
33 1978 1574 109.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.24 1971 1931 151.3 — — — — +2 +34 -58 62.4% +1.08 11–10 (52%) 11–19 (37%) 93.6 -5.65
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1916 149.5 — — — — -29 +158 +37 67.0% +1.31 9–9 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 99.1 +0.63
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1811 118.2 — — — — — +90 +132 52.9% +0.53 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 99.3 +1.66
36 1981 1556 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19 1974 1790 103.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.58
37 1982 1543 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1812 123.5 — — — — +39 -108 -18 49.9% +0.11 29–38 (43%) 17–25 (40%) 93.8 +2.39 — 2044 145.0 — — — — -13 +37 -52 62.4% +1.00 63–50 (56%) 17–29 (37%) 95.0 -3.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.