H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Andres Gimeno H2H: 1-1
Jim Osborne and Andres Gimeno are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Andres Gimeno leads 1–0 on grass, while Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1969 Los Angeles third round 1-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1969* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Osborne | 1-6 7-5 6-4 | Andres Gimeno | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1968* | London | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Andres Gimeno | 6-2 6-3 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andres Gimeno | #150 | #49 | 0 | 2,038 | 246 | 131 | 65.3% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Andres Gimeno | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 48–27 | 64.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 41–25 | 62.1% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 45–26 | 63.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 53–23 | 69.7% | — | 1,899 | 1 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #136 | 1,792 | 1 | 12 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |