H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Bob Carmichael H2H: 2-2
Jim Osborne and Bob Carmichael are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jim Osborne leads 2–1 on clay, while Bob Carmichael leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bob Carmichael won the 1970 Berkeley third round 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1970* | Berkeley | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Bob Carmichael | 7-5 7-6 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1970* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Bob Carmichael | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1969* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jim Osborne | 6-3 10-8 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1969* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Jim Osborne | 7-5 7-5 | Bob Carmichael | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bob Carmichael | #157 | #55 | 0 | 1,903 | 215 | 256 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Bob Carmichael | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 13–8 | 61.9% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 48–33 | 59.3% | — | 1,846 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 36–33 | 52.2% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 20–30 | 40.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 24–37 | 39.3% | #80 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #112 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #71 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #134 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–18 | 5.3% | #220 | 1,428 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #157 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |