H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jim Osborne vs Bob Lutz H2H: 1-2

Bob Lutz holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bob Lutz leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1970 Omaha quarterfinal 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Osborne
USA Age 81 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Bob Lutz
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Osborne 6-1 6-2 Bob Lutz Match data Feb 2, 1970* QF Omaha ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 6-2 3-6 8-6 12-10 Jim Osborne Match data Nov 16, 1968* QF London 2 ATP 250 Hard
Bob Lutz 3-6 6-1 6-4 Jim Osborne Match data Feb 14, 1968* R64 Salisbury ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Osborne #831 #211 0 1,811 118 121 49.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bob Lutz — — — 2,053 388 272 58.8% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Osborne Bob Lutz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 1968 23–15 60.5% — 1,707 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1969 24–16 60.0% — 1,845 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1970 23–18 56.1% — 1,855 0 2
23 1968 35–24 59.3% — 1,634 0 0 1971 45–25 64.3% — 1,992 0 4
24 1969 29–17 63.0% — 1,743 0 0 1972 36–29 55.4% — 1,912 0 5
25 1970 26–29 47.3% — 1,665 0 0 1973 16–14 53.3% — 1,841 0 5
26 1971 15–19 44.1% — 1,717 0 0 1974 15–18 45.5% — 1,745 0 5
27 1972 8–20 28.6% — 1,525 0 0 1975 36–19 65.5% — 1,875 0 6
28 1973 0–4 0.0% — 1,500 0 0 1976 27–17 61.4% — 1,926 0 6
29 1974 3–2 60.0% #228 1,553 0 0 1977 36–22 62.1% — 1,833 0 6
30 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,550 0 0 1978 28–16 63.6% — 1,917 0 7
31 1976 2–2 50.0% #211 1,575 0 0 1979 23–13 63.9% — 1,889 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1980 33–17 66.0% — 1,952 0 11
33 1978 0–1 0.0% #465 1,573 0 0 1981 10–13 43.5% — 1,788 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1982 6–15 28.6% — 1,698 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1983 3–3 50.0% — 1,698 0 11
36 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0 1984 3–1 75.0% — 1,740 0 11
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0 1985 1–1 50.0% — 1,742 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Osborne Bob Lutz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 9 5 14 64.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1968 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
24 1969 8 5 13 61.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 1972 6 7 13 46.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 22 16 38 57.9%
25 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1973 6 4 10 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1971 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1974 5 5 10 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1975 15 8 23 65.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 17 6 23 73.9%
28 1973 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 5 3 8 62.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
29 1974 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1977 9 9 18 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
30 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 14 5 19 73.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
31 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 22 8 30 73.3% 1 0 1 100.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 9 6 15 60.0%
33 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
36 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 55 110 50.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 17 19 36 47.2% — 145 103 248 58.5% 54 47 101 53.5% 68 40 108 63.0% 121 82 203 59.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Osborne Bob Lutz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1708 127.8 — — — — -52 -164 +67 59.8% +0.80 4–5 (44%) — — -2.16
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1846 130.9 — — — — -50 -320 +54 53.3% +0.29 10–3 (77%) — — -1.31
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1855 135.8 — — — — -25 — +52 56.6% +0.49 4–8 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 95.6 -0.30
23 1968 1634 115.0 — — — — +72 -103 -46 57.0% +0.47 7–9 (44%) — — -0.30 1971 1992 148.4 — — — — +23 -288 -66 59.7% +0.74 12–8 (60%) 9–10 (47%) 102.7 -4.07
24 1969 1744 126.2 — — — — +78 -107 -67 58.3% +0.69 8–2 (80%) — — +1.41 1972 1913 151.7 — — — — +8 -156 +37 56.2% +0.37 12–14 (46%) 10–10 (50%) 96.5 -4.12
25 1970 1665 122.6 — — — — +52 -115 +4 46.3% -0.07 9–10 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 98.7 +2.54 1973 1841 135.1 — — — — +30 — — 57.1% +0.44 6–6 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -1.03
26 1971 1717 116.9 — — — — -83 -182 +67 49.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 101.5 +0.99 1974 1745 137.0 — — — — +68 -31 +144 42.5% -0.23 3–4 (43%) 7–9 (44%) 96.4 -2.71
27 1972 1525 122.7 — — — — +64 -28 +142 38.9% -0.29 1–10 (9%) 1–12 (8%) 81.7 +1.15 1975 1875 152.4 — — — — +83 -147 — 63.6% +1.08 7–4 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 -0.90
28 1973 1501 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 11.1% -1.67 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09 1976 1926 158.4 — — — — +60 -149 -54 56.3% +0.54 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 102.0 -4.63
29 1974 1553 112.6 — — — — +29 — — 58.3% +0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.21 1977 1833 152.1 — — — — +43 -24 +83 58.8% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 7–10 (41%) 99.8 -3.05
30 1975 1550 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.16 1978 1917 150.2 — — — — +30 -70 — 61.5% +0.80 8–5 (62%) 7–7 (50%) 100.3 -2.30
31 1976 1576 112.5 — — — — +12 — — 50.0% +0.17 2–2 (50%) — — -0.11 1979 1890 140.1 — — — — +29 — -26 63.9% +1.27 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 94.4 +0.36
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1952 152.7 — — — — +46 — -133 61.7% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.36
33 1978 1574 109.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.24 1981 1789 132.9 — — — — +6 — — 47.3% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 96.4 -1.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1698 127.1 — — — — +10 +75 — 31.4% -1.04 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.4 -1.57
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1698 117.4 — — — — +8 — — 53.8% +0.46 1–0 0–1 — +0.55
36 1981 1556 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19 1984 1740 119.9 — — — — +6 — — 66.7% +0.44 1–0 1–0 — -0.67
37 1982 1543 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07 1985 1742 103.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — 1–0 — -0.35
Career — 1812 123.5 — — — — +39 -108 -18 49.9% +0.11 29–38 (43%) 17–25 (40%) 93.8 +2.40 — 2053 152.2 — — — — +26 -133 +21 56.9% +0.55 106–87 (55%) 75–86 (47%) 96.1 -4.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.