H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Charlie Pasarell H2H: 0-2
Charlie Pasarell holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Charlie Pasarell won the 1970 New Orleans quarterfinal 6-4 6-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 1970* | New Orleans | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Charlie Pasarell | 6-4 6-5 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1968* | Milwaukee | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Charlie Pasarell | 6-2 6-2 8-6 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Charlie Pasarell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |