H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Clark Graebner H2H: 1-3
Clark Graebner holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Clark Graebner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1971 Columbus fourth round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1971* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jim Osborne | 7-6 6-4 | Clark Graebner | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1970* | Hampton | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Clark Graebner | 6-1 12-10 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1968* | Las Vegas | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Clark Graebner | 6-2 7-5 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1968* | South Orange | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Clark Graebner | 6-3 1-6 7-5 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Clark Graebner | #199 | #45 | 0 | 2,015 | 342 | 162 | 67.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Clark Graebner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 74–22 | 77.1% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 49–14 | 77.8% | — | 1,842 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 58–28 | 67.4% | — | 1,839 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 75–29 | 72.1% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #48 | 1,768 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #99 | 1,685 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,537 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |