H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Dick Crealy H2H: 1-2
Dick Crealy holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Dick Crealy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dick Crealy won the 1970 Los Angeles second round 6-4 3-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1970* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Dick Crealy | 6-4 3-6 7-6 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1969* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Jim Osborne | 6-3 6-1 | Dick Crealy | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1969* | Haverford | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Dick Crealy | 6-2 6-4 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dick Crealy | #509 | #33 | 0 | 1,904 | 335 | 317 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Dick Crealy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 31–16 | 66.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 30–23 | 56.6% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 10–23 | 30.3% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–14 | 56.2% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–33 | 48.4% | #51 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 41–40 | 50.6% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 41–37 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 46–34 | 57.5% | #38 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 31–30 | 50.8% | #68 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 19–33 | 36.5% | #131 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #274 | 1,497 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #309 | 1,509 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |