H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Ian Fletcher H2H: 0-1
Ian Fletcher holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ian Fletcher leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ian Fletcher won the 1972 Tanglewood third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 77
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1972* | Tanglewood | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ian Fletcher | 6-3 7-6 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ian Fletcher | #826 | #56 | 0 | 1,755 | 105 | 114 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Ian Fletcher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 11–8 | 57.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 23–18 | 56.1% | — | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 35–36 | 49.3% | #87 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #124 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #184 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #667 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |