H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jim Osborne vs Jeff Austin H2H: 1-0

Jim Osborne holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Austin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1974 Salt Lake City round of 16 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 81 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 75 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Osborne 6-3 6-2 Jeff Austin Match data Mar 28, 1974* R16 Salt Lake City ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Osborne #831 #211 0 1,811 118 121 49.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jeff Austin 1,633 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Osborne Jeff Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1968 35–24 59.3% 1,634 0 0
24 1969 29–17 63.0% 1,743 0 0
25 1970 26–29 47.3% 1,665 0 0
26 1971 15–19 44.1% 1,717 0 0
27 1972 8–20 28.6% 1,525 0 0
28 1973 0–4 0.0% 1,500 0 0
29 1974 3–2 60.0% #228 1,553 0 0
30 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,550 0 0
31 1976 2–2 50.0% #211 1,575 0 0
33 1978 0–1 0.0% #465 1,573 0 0
36 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,555 0 0
37 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,542 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Osborne Jeff Austin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1970 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1971 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1973 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1974 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 8 12 33.3%
23 1968 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
24 1969 8 5 13 61.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
25 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1971 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
28 1973 0 4 4 0.0%
29 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 1975 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1978 0 1 1 0.0%
36 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
37 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 55 55 110 50.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 17 19 36 47.2% 14 23 37 37.8% 7 12 19 36.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 13 25 38 34.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Osborne Jeff Austin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1970 1489 99.7 33.3% -1.67 0–1 -0.08
19 1971 1482 104.7 +13 +58 42.9% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 99.1 +0.36
20 1972 1438 109.6 +23 +111 39.3% -0.54 1–6 (14%) 3–4 (43%) 95.8 +0.76
21 1973 1597 119.8 +28 -92 52.0% +0.28 4–4 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 100.3 +0.84
22 1974 1557 115.8 -16 -42 37.5% -0.72 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +1.53
23 1968 1634 115.0 +72 -103 -46 57.0% +0.47 7–9 (44%) -0.30 1975 1551 123.3 +5 +2 41.7% -0.49 5–3 (63%) 3–8 (27%) 99.3 +2.29
24 1969 1744 126.2 +78 -107 -67 58.3% +0.69 8–2 (80%) +1.41 1976 1526 110.2 -31 26.1% -2.00 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.18
25 1970 1665 122.6 +52 -115 +4 46.3% -0.07 9–10 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 98.7 +2.54 1977 1502 103.6 -42 0.0% -3.38 0–1 -0.24
26 1971 1717 116.9 -83 -182 +67 49.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 101.5 +0.99
27 1972 1525 122.7 +64 -28 +142 38.9% -0.29 1–10 (9%) 1–12 (8%) 81.7 +1.15
28 1973 1501 104.3 +40 11.1% -1.67 0–1 1–2 (33%) -0.09
29 1974 1553 112.6 +29 58.3% +0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.21
30 1975 1550 104.5 0.0% -3.00 -0.16
31 1976 1576 112.5 +12 50.0% +0.17 2–2 (50%) -0.11
33 1978 1574 109.5 0.0% -3.50 -0.24
36 1981 1556 95.7 0.0% -3.00 +0.19
37 1982 1543 98.8 0.0% -3.50 +0.07
Career 1812 123.5 +39 -108 -18 49.9% +0.11 29–38 (43%) 17–25 (40%) 93.8 +2.40 1633 120.1 -1 +53 -73 39.9% -0.63 15–25 (38%) 17–26 (40%) 93.1 +5.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.