H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Manuel Santana H2H: 2-1
Jim Osborne holds a 2–1 lead over Manuel Santana in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on carpet, while Manuel Santana leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1971 New York fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 1971* | New York | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jim Osborne | 6-4 6-4 | Manuel Santana | Match data |
| Apr 25, 1970* | Houston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Manuel Santana | 6-3 11-9 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1970* | Omaha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jim Osborne | 23-23 (ret.) | Manuel Santana | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Manuel Santana | #374 | #145 | 0 | 1,994 | 113 | 50 | 69.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Manuel Santana | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 38–11 | 77.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 25–6 | 80.6% | — | 1,909 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,992 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #188 | 1,743 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,699 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #365 | 1,640 | 0 | 11 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #374 | 1,641 | 0 | 11 |