H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Patricio Cornejo H2H: 2-2
Jim Osborne and Patricio Cornejo are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patricio Cornejo leads 2–1 on clay, while Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1970 South Orange second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 82
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1970* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jim Osborne | 6-2 6-4 | Patricio Cornejo | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1970* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Patricio Cornejo | 6-4 11-9 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1970* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Patricio Cornejo | 6-4 11-9 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1969* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jim Osborne | 6-4 6-2 | Patricio Cornejo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Patricio Cornejo | #335 | #65 | 0 | 1,708 | 142 | 202 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Patricio Cornejo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 20–32 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #138 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #108 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #69 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #172 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |