H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jim Osborne vs Patricio Cornejo H2H: 2-2

Jim Osborne and Patricio Cornejo are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Patricio Cornejo leads 2–1 on clay, while Jim Osborne leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1970 South Orange round of 64 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Osborne
USA Age 81 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Patricio Cornejo
CHI Age 82 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Osborne 6-2 6-4 Patricio Cornejo Match data Sep 3, 1970* R64 South Orange ATP 250 Hard
Patricio Cornejo 6-4 11-9 Jim Osborne Match data Jul 29, 1970* R64 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Patricio Cornejo 6-4 11-9 Jim Osborne Match data Jul 29, 1970* R64 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Jim Osborne 6-4 6-2 Patricio Cornejo Match data Jul 10, 1969* R32 Washington Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Osborne #831 #211 0 1,811 118 121 49.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricio Cornejo #335 #65 0 1,709 142 202 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Osborne Patricio Cornejo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1968 35–24 59.3% — 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1969 29–17 63.0% — 1,743 0 0 1968 23–16 59.0% — 1,599 0 0
25 1970 26–29 47.3% — 1,665 0 0 1969 13–11 54.2% — 1,588 0 0
26 1971 15–19 44.1% — 1,717 0 0 1970 10–15 40.0% — 1,579 0 0
27 1972 8–20 28.6% — 1,525 0 0 1971 13–20 39.4% — 1,547 0 0
28 1973 0–4 0.0% — 1,500 0 0 1972 11–19 36.7% — 1,578 0 0
29 1974 3–2 60.0% #228 1,553 0 0 1973 11–23 32.4% #99 1,552 0 0
30 1975 0–1 0.0% #308 1,550 0 0 1974 20–31 39.2% #66 1,613 0 0
31 1976 2–2 50.0% #211 1,575 0 0 1975 8–22 26.7% #138 1,581 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1976 13–15 46.4% #108 1,626 0 0
33 1978 0–1 0.0% #465 1,573 0 0 1977 14–14 50.0% #89 1,685 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 1978 6–16 27.3% #172 1,586 0 0
36 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Osborne Patricio Cornejo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 1968 19 12 31 61.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1969 8 5 13 61.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 1968 — — — — 14 9 23 60.9% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — —
25 1970 16 12 28 57.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 1969 — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
26 1971 7 10 17 41.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1970 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
27 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1971 2 8 10 20.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1973 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
29 1974 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1973 1 4 5 20.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
30 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 4 8 12 33.3% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 1976 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 6 15 21 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 14 14 28 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 6 16 22 27.3% — — — — — — — —
36 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 55 55 110 50.0% 19 24 43 44.2% 27 23 50 54.0% 17 19 36 47.2% — 16 35 51 31.4% 95 112 207 45.9% 23 33 56 41.1% 8 22 30 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Osborne Patricio Cornejo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 1968 1634 115.0 — — — — +72 -103 -46 57.0% +0.47 7–9 (44%) — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1969 1744 126.2 — — — — +78 -107 -67 58.3% +0.69 8–2 (80%) — — +1.41 1968 1600 110.9 — — — — — -21 +16 57.3% +0.36 3–6 (33%) — — +0.70
25 1970 1665 122.6 — — — — +52 -115 +4 46.3% -0.07 9–10 (47%) 4–3 (57%) 98.7 +2.54 1969 1589 105.3 — — — — — +5 -2 50.8% -0.09 5–2 (71%) — — +0.34
26 1971 1717 116.9 — — — — -83 -182 +67 49.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 9–7 (56%) 101.5 +0.99 1970 1579 111.3 — — — — -29 +52 -62 41.5% -0.57 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.1 -0.73
27 1972 1525 122.7 — — — — +64 -28 +142 38.9% -0.29 1–10 (9%) 1–12 (8%) 81.7 +1.15 1971 1548 115.5 — — — — -116 +126 -37 37.3% -0.92 1–3 (25%) 6–4 (60%) 100.4 +0.42
28 1973 1501 104.3 — — — — +40 — — 11.1% -1.67 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.09 1972 1579 114.4 — — — — -122 +70 -55 40.8% -0.57 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.0 +0.47
29 1974 1553 112.6 — — — — +29 — — 58.3% +0.42 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.21 1973 1552 122.9 — — — — -99 +56 — 34.2% -0.99 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 92.9 -0.05
30 1975 1550 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.16 1974 1613 135.4 — — — — -87 +63 -172 44.3% -0.19 6–11 (35%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 -1.79
31 1976 1576 112.5 — — — — +12 — — 50.0% +0.17 2–2 (50%) — — -0.11 1975 1581 135.2 — — — — -77 +40 -134 32.3% -0.95 1–4 (20%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -2.08
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1627 119.8 — — — — -51 -36 — 48.5% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.4 +1.82
33 1978 1574 109.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.24 1977 1686 123.4 — — — — — -6 — 46.4% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 1–5 (17%) 102.3 +1.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1587 122.9 — — — — — -12 — 30.2% -1.04 4–3 (57%) 1–5 (17%) 97.6 -1.19
36 1981 1556 95.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1982 1543 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1812 123.5 — — — — +39 -108 -18 49.9% +0.11 29–38 (43%) 17–25 (40%) 93.8 +2.40 — 1710 125.6 — — — — -89 +26 -30 43.0% -0.42 39–51 (43%) 25–46 (35%) 91.6 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.