Jim Osborne
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Curtis | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 31, 1971 | H2H |
| Stan Smith | 1 | 7 | 8 | Mar 11, 1972 | H2H |
| Arthur Ashe | 1 | 7 | 8 | Sep 12, 1971 | H2H |
| Thomaz Koch | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 5, 1973 | H2H |
| Onny Parun | 4 | 2 | 6 | Mar 5, 1973 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Richard Gonzalez H2H: 0-2
Richard Gonzalez holds a 2–0 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richard Gonzalez leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Gonzalez won the 1972 Des Moines quarterfinal 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
2
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Gonzalez | 6-4 7-6 | Jim Osborne | Match data | Feb 11, 1972* | QF | Des Moines | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Richard Gonzalez | 6-2 7-9 7-5 | Jim Osborne | Match data | Sep 25, 1969* | SF | Los Angeles Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,811 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Richard Gonzalez | — | — | — | 2,030 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jim Osborne | Richard Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Jim Osborne | Richard Gonzalez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1968 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1968 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 1969 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1969 | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% |
| 1970 | 16 | 12 | 28 | 57.1% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1970 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% |
| 1971 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1971 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 1972 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1972 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% |
| 1973 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 55 | 55 | 110 | 50.0% | 19 | 24 | 43 | 44.2% | 27 | 23 | 50 | 54.0% | 17 | 19 | 36 | 47.2% | Career | 48 | 27 | 75 | 64.0% | 14 | 14 | 28 | 50.0% | 32 | 18 | 50 | 64.0% | 28 | 26 | 54 | 51.9% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Jim Osborne | Richard Gonzalez | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1968 | 1634 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | +73 | -103 | -46 | 57.0% | +0.47 | 7–9 (44%) | — | — | -0.30 | 1968 | 1694 | 115.5 | — | — | — | — | -167 | -49 | -59 | 51.2% | +0.16 | 8–7 (53%) | — | — | -2.13 |
| 1969 | 1744 | 126.2 | — | — | — | — | +78 | -108 | -67 | 58.3% | +0.69 | 8–2 (80%) | — | — | +1.40 | 1969 | 1958 | 138.2 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -295 | -88 | 61.5% | +0.72 | 12–7 (63%) | — | — | -2.11 |
| 1970 | 1665 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +52 | -115 | +4 | 46.3% | -0.07 | 9–10 (47%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.7 | +2.54 | 1970 | 1938 | 138.5 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | -100 | 55.1% | -0.12 | 6–5 (55%) | 6–2 (75%) | 100.8 | -2.32 |
| 1971 | 1717 | 116.9 | — | — | — | — | -83 | -182 | +67 | 49.3% | -0.23 | 1–3 (25%) | 9–7 (56%) | 101.5 | +0.99 | 1971 | 1935 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | +97 | -289 | -141 | 67.3% | +1.15 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.5 | +0.19 |
| 1972 | 1525 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +64 | -28 | +142 | 38.9% | -0.29 | 1–10 (9%) | 1–12 (8%) | 81.7 | +1.14 | 1972 | 1837 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +100 | — | -61 | 62.7% | +0.64 | 6–2 (75%) | 4–3 (57%) | 101.7 | +3.13 |
| 1973 | 1501 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | +40 | — | — | 11.1% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.09 | 1973 | 1815 | 122.6 | — | — | — | — | +71 | — | -49 | 43.5% | -0.83 | 2–1 (67%) | 6–3 (67%) | 104.0 | -1.43 |
| 1974 | 1553 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 58.3% | +0.42 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 1550 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 1576 | 112.5 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | — | 50.0% | +0.17 | 2–2 (50%) | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 1574 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1556 | 95.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1543 | 98.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1812 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -108 | -18 | 49.9% | +0.11 | 29–38 (43%) | 17–25 (40%) | 93.8 | +2.39 | Career | 2031 | 133.8 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -105 | -84 | 57.8% | +0.39 | 38–23 (62%) | 19–9 (68%) | 111.0 | -2.29 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Richard Gonzalez
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ken Rosewall | 5 | 10 | 15 | Nov 21, 1970 | — |
| Rod Laver | 4 | 11 | 15 | Oct 4, 1970 | — |
| Fred Stolle | 7 | 3 | 10 | Aug 23, 1970 | — |
| Andres Gimeno | 5 | 4 | 9 | May 18, 1970 | — |
| Roy Emerson | 4 | 4 | 8 | Aug 24, 1970 | — |