H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jim Osborne vs Torben Ulrich H2H: 1-2
Torben Ulrich holds a 2–1 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Torben Ulrich leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Osborne won the 1972 South Orange third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
DEN
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 1972* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jim Osborne | 6-3 7-6 | Torben Ulrich | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1971* | Charlotte | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Torben Ulrich | 6-4 7-5 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Feb 14, 1969* | Salisbury | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Torben Ulrich | 6-2 6-3 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Torben Ulrich | #326 | #96 | 0 | 1,757 | 83 | 133 | 38.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Osborne | Torben Ulrich | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 37–19 | 66.1% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 9–14 | 39.1% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 6–32 | 15.8% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 1 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #110 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #149 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |