Jim Pugh
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Gilbert | 3 | 3 | 6 | May 16, 1990 | H2H |
| Tim Mayotte | 2 | 4 | 6 | Mar 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Jim Grabb | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 5, 1989 | H2H |
| Dan Goldie | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 2, 1990 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 29, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Jim Pugh vs Bruno Oresar H2H: 0-1
Bruno Oresar holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Pugh in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bruno Oresar leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bruno Oresar won the 1988 Miami Open round of 128 7-5 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruno Oresar | 7-5 6-2 6-2 | Jim Pugh | Match data | Mar 15, 1988* | R128 | Miami Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,833 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Bruno Oresar | #673 | #46 | 296 | 1,713 | 52 | 68 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Pugh | Bruno Oresar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #159 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #57 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #88 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #159 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #239 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,567 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jim Pugh | Bruno Oresar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1986 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1987 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 1990 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 24 | 1988 | 17 | 14 | 31 | 54.8% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 48 | 54 | 102 | 47.1% | 12 | 19 | 31 | 38.7% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | — | 13 | 17 | 30 | 43.3% | 37 | 44 | 81 | 45.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jim Pugh | Bruno Oresar | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1566 | 126.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | 53.8% | +0.08 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.07 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1588 | 122.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | 40.5% | -0.78 | 1–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.71 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1551 | 117.9 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +23 | — | 40.0% | -0.17 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.10 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1654 | 130.2 | — | — | — | — | -95 | +32 | — | 52.2% | +0.09 | 6–3 (67%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +1.73 |
| 22 | 1986 | 1462 | 101.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 0.0% | -2.89 | — | — | — | +0.05 | 1989 | 1576 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -40 | +33 | — | 40.4% | -0.49 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–7 (36%) | — | +0.22 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1701 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | -144 | — | 51.4% | +0.20 | 9–3 (75%) | 8–14 (36%) | — | +3.27 | 1990 | 1547 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -1 | — | 37.1% | -0.82 | 3–5 (38%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -1.01 |
| 24 | 1988 | 1708 | 139.3 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -112 | — | 50.3% | +0.02 | 12–13 (48%) | 7–6 (54%) | — | -0.43 | 1991 | 1576 | 110.4 | +0.38 | +0.80 | 1.126 | 52.3% | — | +7 | — | 54.5% | +0.82 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1732 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | -49 | -149 | -26 | 51.0% | +0.14 | 7–6 (54%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -2.70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 1726 | 132.0 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -124 | -21 | 42.3% | -0.53 | 9–8 (53%) | 6–6 (50%) | — | -1.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 1596 | 111.1 | -2.71 | -1.12 | 0.798 | 45.7% | +47 | — | — | 31.0% | -1.38 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 1589 | 102.9 | -2.68 | +1.75 | 0.739 | 42.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 1567 | 103.4 | -2.59 | -0.14 | 0.551 | 37.9% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1833 | 139.8 | -2.69 | -0.72 | 0.747 | 44.1% | +5 | -128 | -24 | 46.8% | -0.18 | 38–35 (52%) | 33–36 (48%) | 101.3 | -1.24 | — | 1714 | 128.3 | +0.38 | +0.80 | 1.126 | 52.3% | -24 | +26 | — | 44.1% | -0.32 | 17–17 (50%) | 19–21 (48%) | 100.8 | +0.64 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Bruno Oresar
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 18, 1990 | H2H |
| Horst Skoff | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 7, 1987 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 26, 1990 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 27, 1990 | H2H |