H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jim Pugh vs David Pate H2H: 2-1

Jim Pugh holds a 2–1 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Pugh leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Pugh won the 1989 Memphis round of 64 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Pugh
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Pugh #71 6-1 7-6 David Pate #46 Match data Feb 15, 1989* R64 Memphis ATP 250 Hard
Jim Pugh #71 6-7 7-5 7-6 David Pate #43 Match data Oct 8, 1988* QF Scottsdale ATP 250 Hard
David Pate #20 4-6 6-3 6-3 Jim Pugh #47 Match data Feb 19, 1988* R16 Memphis ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Pugh #1,147 #37 423 1,833 85 95 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Pugh David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1986 0–4 0.0% #99 1,462 0 0 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1987 24–20 54.5% #45 1,701 0 0 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1
24 1988 27–27 50.0% #63 1,707 0 0 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1
25 1989 20–18 52.6% #60 1,731 0 1 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2
26 1990 13–15 46.4% #121 1,726 0 1 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2
27 1991 1–8 11.1% #397 1,595 0 1 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1992 0–1 0.0% #1074 1,588 0 1 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2
31 1995 0–2 0.0% #273 1,567 0 1 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Pugh David Pate
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1986 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1987 13 12 25 52.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
24 1988 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
25 1989 10 11 21 47.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1990 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 54 102 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 15 14 29 51.7% — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Pugh David Pate
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28
22 1986 1462 101.4 — — — — +25 — — 0.0% -2.89 — — — +0.05 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
23 1987 1701 136.3 — — — — +18 -144 — 51.4% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 8–14 (36%) — +3.27 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85
24 1988 1708 139.3 — — — — +24 -112 — 50.3% +0.02 12–13 (48%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.43 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85
25 1989 1732 141.9 — — — — -49 -149 -26 51.0% +0.14 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.70 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04
26 1990 1726 132.0 — — — — +1 -124 -21 42.3% -0.53 9–8 (53%) 6–6 (50%) — -1.56 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56
27 1991 1596 111.1 -2.71 -1.12 0.798 45.7% +47 — — 31.0% -1.38 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.46 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42
28 1992 1589 102.9 -2.68 +1.75 0.739 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.20 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43
31 1995 1567 103.4 -2.59 -0.14 0.551 37.9% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.20 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14
Career — 1833 139.8 -2.69 -0.72 0.747 44.1% +5 -128 -24 46.8% -0.18 38–35 (52%) 33–36 (48%) 101.3 -1.24 — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.