H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Pugh vs Mark Kratzmann H2H: 1-0
Jim Pugh holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Kratzmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Pugh leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Pugh won the 1990 Cincinnati Masters second round 3-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1990* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jim Pugh | 3-6 7-5 6-0 | Mark Kratzmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,832 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Kratzmann | #1,147 | #50 | 557 | 1,750 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Pugh | Mark Kratzmann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #616 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #246 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #209 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #182 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #122 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #75 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #208 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #572 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |