H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Pugh vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 1-0
Jim Pugh holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Pugh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Pugh won the 1990 Bologna third round 5-7 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1990* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jim Pugh | 5-7 7-6 7-5 | Martin Wostenholme | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,832 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Martin Wostenholme | #1,171 | #84 | 265 | 1,607 | 44 | 79 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Pugh | Martin Wostenholme | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #329 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #186 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #251 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #293 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #156 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #153 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |