H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jim Pugh vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 1-0

Jim Pugh holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Pugh leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Pugh won the 1990 Bologna round of 32 5-7 7-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jim Pugh
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Martin Wostenholme
CAN Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Pugh #75 5-7 7-6 7-5 Martin Wostenholme #120 Match data May 24, 1990* R32 Bologna ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jim Pugh #1,147 #37 423 1,833 85 95 47.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Martin Wostenholme #1,171 #84 265 1,606 44 79 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jim Pugh Martin Wostenholme
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,497 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1982 2–1 66.7% — 1,519 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% #329 1,501 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1984 2–3 40.0% #186 1,526 0 0
22 1986 0–4 0.0% #99 1,462 0 0 1985 4–8 33.3% #93 1,556 0 0
23 1987 24–20 54.5% #45 1,701 0 0 1986 9–18 33.3% #190 1,533 0 0
24 1988 27–27 50.0% #63 1,707 0 0 1987 2–7 22.2% #251 1,494 0 0
25 1989 20–18 52.6% #60 1,731 0 1 1988 3–4 42.9% #293 1,496 0 0
26 1990 13–15 46.4% #121 1,726 0 1 1989 6–8 42.9% #120 1,536 0 0
27 1991 1–8 11.1% #397 1,595 0 1 1990 10–19 34.5% #156 1,508 0 0
28 1992 0–1 0.0% #1074 1,588 0 1 1991 6–7 46.2% #153 1,523 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #340 1,512 0 0
31 1995 0–2 0.0% #273 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jim Pugh Martin Wostenholme
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1986 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1987 13 12 25 52.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1988 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
25 1989 10 11 21 47.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 1 8 87.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1990 7 7 14 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 48 54 102 47.1% 12 19 31 38.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 15 14 29 51.7% — 16 33 49 32.7% 21 36 57 36.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 12/12 of Jim Pugh's and 13/14 of Martin Wostenholme's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jim Pugh Martin Wostenholme
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 9/9 4.3 4.9 60.8% 63.4% 38.7% 53.1% 53.9% 53.6% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 1/1 5.0 5.0 55.1% 63.0% 31.8% 16.7% 16.7% 49.0% 37.7% 1991 12/13 1.9 2.3 68.1% 64.5% 47.0% 50.5% 47.1% 58.8% 42.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 1/1 4.0 7.0 71.0% 63.6% 33.3% 60.0% 50.0% 54.8% 39.7%
31 1995 2/2 3.0 3.0 49.3% 54.2% 40.8% 50.9% 57.1% 46.3% 29.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12/180 4.2 4.6 58.4% 61.8% 38.5% 49.7% 51.4% 52.0% 35.8% — 13/123 2.1 2.7 68.3% 64.4% 46.0% 51.2% 47.4% 58.4% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jim Pugh Martin Wostenholme
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1497 114.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.24
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1520 101.6 — — — — +44 — — 55.6% 0.00 2–1 (67%) — — +0.70
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1502 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.32
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1526 113.6 — — — — — +54 — 33.3% -0.92 2–0 1–1 — -0.27
22 1986 1462 101.4 — — — — +25 — — 0.0% -2.89 — — — +0.05 1985 1557 128.6 — — — — +23 -30 — 37.5% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.9 +0.06
23 1987 1701 136.3 — — — — +18 -144 — 51.4% +0.20 9–3 (75%) 8–14 (36%) 103.7 +3.27 1986 1533 126.0 — — — — -21 +67 +22 36.8% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 1–6 (14%) 96.3 +0.42
24 1988 1708 139.3 — — — — +24 -112 — 50.3% +0.02 12–13 (48%) 7–6 (54%) 98.2 -0.43 1987 1495 96.0 — — — — -29 +77 — 22.2% -2.28 — 0–1 — -0.08
25 1989 1732 141.9 — — — — -49 -149 -26 51.0% +0.14 7–6 (54%) 9–7 (56%) 103.7 -2.70 1988 1497 107.0 — — — — -8 — — 38.5% -0.46 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.93
26 1990 1726 132.0 — — — — +1 -124 -21 42.3% -0.53 9–8 (53%) 6–6 (50%) 103.0 -1.56 1989 1537 120.9 — — — — -67 +62 — 45.2% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.37
27 1991 1596 111.1 -2.71 -1.12 0.798 45.7% +47 — — 31.0% -1.38 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.5 -0.46 1990 1509 115.6 — — — — +21 +47 — 36.6% -1.13 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 98.1 +1.22
28 1992 1589 102.9 -2.68 +1.75 0.739 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.20 1991 1523 103.7 -1.82 +1.47 1.033 50.4% -15 +33 +68 50.0% -0.30 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.29
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1512 102.2 -1.95 -1.09 0.880 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — -0.01
31 1995 1567 103.4 -2.59 -0.14 0.551 37.9% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1833 139.8 -2.69 -0.72 0.747 44.1% +5 -128 -24 46.8% -0.18 38–35 (52%) 33–36 (48%) 101.3 -1.24 — 1607 122.6 -1.83 +1.27 1.020 50.3% +2 +55 +45 37.9% -0.89 14–22 (39%) 12–22 (35%) 94.8 +3.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.