H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jim Pugh vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 1-1
Jim Pugh and Peter Lundgren are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jim Pugh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Pugh won the 1989 Newport final 6-4 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1989* | Newport | ATP 250 | F | Grass | Jim Pugh | 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Peter Lundgren | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1987* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Peter Lundgren | 6-1 7-5 | Jim Pugh | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,832 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jim Pugh | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |