H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs Angel Gimenez H2H: 1-0
Jimmy Arias holds a 1–0 lead over Angel Gimenez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jimmy Arias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1982 Indianapolis fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 70
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1982 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jimmy Arias | 6-4 6-4 | Angel Gimenez | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Angel Gimenez | #806 | #41 | 0 | 1,777 | 86 | 106 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | Angel Gimenez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #332 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #42 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #195 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #86 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |