H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs Dan Cassidy H2H: 2-0

Jimmy Arias holds a 2–0 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Arias leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1988 Charleston round of 32 6-2 6-2.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 0
2 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jimmy Arias #122 6-2 6-2 Dan Cassidy #117 Match data Apr 28, 1988* R32 Charleston ATP 250 Clay
Jimmy Arias #19 6-3 6-4 Dan Cassidy #79 Match data Feb 28, 1985* R32 Houston ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Dan Cassidy #753 #74 187 1,629 35 75 31.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Jimmy Arias Dan Cassidy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0 1984 12–8 60.0% #126 1,629 0 1
1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 1985 7–19 26.9% #219 1,509 0 1
1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5 1986 2–6 25.0% #274 1,511 0 1
1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 1987 4–3 57.1% #106 1,565 0 1
1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 1988 7–21 25.0% #227 1,515 0 1
1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1989 3–10 23.1% #140 1,456 0 1
1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1990 0–7 0.0% #381 1,401 0 1
1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5
1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5
1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5
1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5
1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5
1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5
1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5
1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Jimmy Arias Dan Cassidy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0%
1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 1986 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1988 7 13 20 35.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2%
1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0%
1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9%
1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0%
1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1998 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% Career 23 41 64 35.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 11 12 8.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Jimmy Arias Dan Cassidy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1531 118.3 +61 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) +0.21 1969 1486 102.3 25.0% -1.00 -0.08
1981 1626 120.1 +15 -65 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) +1.61 1984 1630 119.1 -17 +2 58.3% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 9–5 (64%) +1.87
1982 1858 146.3 -127 -26 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) +1.99 1985 1510 112.1 +51 -19 +47 31.4% -1.29 4–4 (50%) 4–8 (33%) +0.61
1983 2040 155.5 -177 +21 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) -0.41 1986 1512 118.0 +6 +35 30.0% -1.20 2–2 (50%) 0–1 -0.59
1984 1879 150.8 -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) -2.32 1987 1565 111.6 -9 -18 47.1% -0.23 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) +0.25
1985 1812 143.3 +55 +10 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) +1.26 1988 1515 119.8 +22 -24 29.2% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) -0.50
1986 1669 139.2 +2 +190 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) -0.60 1989 1457 105.2 +10 37.8% -1.13 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) +0.90
1987 1721 145.4 -8 +100 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) -2.03 1990 1402 99.8 +26 12.5% -2.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) +0.08
1988 1615 129.7 +8 +119 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) -0.94
1989 1696 146.3 -18 +50 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) -2.89
1990 1681 136.8 -3 +36 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) -1.09
1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) +0.40
1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) -0.26
1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.34
1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 +0.36
1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% 0.0% -4.50 -0.03
Career 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 Career 1630 118.6 +19 -6 +20 36.1% -1.01 12–20 (38%) 19–26 (42%) 94.0 +2.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.