H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs David Pate H2H: 3-0

Jimmy Arias holds a 3–0 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Arias leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1987 Miami Open round of 64 6-7 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jimmy Arias #53 6-7 4-6 6-3 7-6 6-1 David Pate #31 Match data Feb 25, 1987* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard
Jimmy Arias #5 3-6 7-6 6-2 David Pate #87 Match data May 10, 1984* R16 Forest Hills Wct ATP 250 Clay
Jimmy Arias #6 3-6 7-5 7-6 David Pate Match data Feb 17, 1984* R16 La Quinta ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Arias David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5 — — — — — — —
19 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1
24 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1
25 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2
26 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2
27 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Arias David Pate
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
24 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
25 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Arias David Pate
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08
20 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) — +1.26 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29
21 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.60 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28
22 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.03 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
23 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.94 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85
24 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.89 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85
25 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.09 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04
26 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.40 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56
27 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42
28 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85
29 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12
33 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14
Career — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.