H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs Jaime Fillol H2H: 0-1
Jaime Fillol holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jaime Fillol leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jaime Fillol won the 1980 Washington second round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 1980* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jaime Fillol | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | Jaime Fillol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 |