H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs Mark Dickson H2H: 2-2

Jimmy Arias and Mark Dickson are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Arias leads 2–1 on clay, while Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1985 Houston round of 16 6-3 4-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Mark Dickson
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Dickson #36 6-3 4-6 7-6 Jimmy Arias #19 Match data Mar 1, 1985* R16 Houston ATP 250 Carpet
Jimmy Arias #5 6-4 5-7 6-2 Mark Dickson #42 Match data Jul 20, 1984* R16 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay
Mark Dickson #53 6-3 6-7 7-5 Jimmy Arias #6 Match data Apr 7, 1984* QF Houston Wct ATP 250 Clay
Jimmy Arias #16 7-6 6-3 Mark Dickson #43 Match data May 21, 1983* R16 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,818 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Arias Mark Dickson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5 — — — — — — —
19 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 — — — — — — —
21 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,501 0 0
22 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,688 0 0
23 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5 1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0
24 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5 1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,812 0 2
25 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5 1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2
26 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5 1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2
27 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5 1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,619 0 2
28 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5 1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2
29 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Arias Mark Dickson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 1983 7 4 11 63.6% 11 12 23 47.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
24 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
25 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 6 10 16 37.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
28 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
29 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% — 43 41 84 51.2% 43 39 82 52.4% 11 8 19 57.9% 31 30 61 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Arias Mark Dickson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) — +1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.60 1981 1501 116.6 — — — — — +36 — 30.0% -1.00 1–1 0–1 — -0.12
22 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.03 1982 1689 143.1 — — — — +21 -140 — 50.8% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.03
23 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.94 1983 1699 149.0 — — — — +76 -61 -176 51.8% +0.23 6–9 (40%) 12–13 (48%) — -1.74
24 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.89 1984 1812 143.4 — — — — +12 -64 — 58.3% +0.53 16–13 (55%) 10–10 (50%) — +2.51
25 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.09 1985 1718 135.5 — — — — -39 -4 -56 51.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) — -0.14
26 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.40 1986 1614 109.2 — — — — -4 +68 — 48.9% -0.47 2–7 (22%) 5–1 (83%) — +2.89
27 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26 1987 1619 119.2 — — — — +3 +34 — 49.0% -0.06 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.68
28 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34 1988 1625 120.2 — — — — -46 +29 +71 52.4% +0.10 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.23
29 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 — 1819 142.5 — — — — +11 -32 -54 52.5% +0.17 40–52 (43%) 47–46 (51%) 97.9 +1.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.