H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 0-1
Mark Edmondson holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1982 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 6-7 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1982* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mark Edmondson | 6-7 7-5 7-6 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | Mark Edmondson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 |