H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 0-1

Mark Edmondson holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Edmondson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Edmondson won the 1982 Tokyo Indoor round of 16 6-7 7-5 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Mark Edmondson
AUS Age 72 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Edmondson #15 6-7 7-5 7-6 Jimmy Arias #20 Match data Oct 29, 1982* R16 Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Mark Edmondson #525 #15 0 1,927 244 231 51.4% 1 0 0 0 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Arias Mark Edmondson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 — — — — — — —
20 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0
21 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1975 2–4 33.3% #212 1,500 0 0
22 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1976 42–29 59.2% #35 1,755 1 2
23 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5 1977 16–24 40.0% #92 1,602 1 2
24 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5 1978 15–16 48.4% #79 1,685 1 3
25 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5 1979 26–26 50.0% #95 1,742 1 3
26 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5 1980 18–23 43.9% #91 1,715 1 3
27 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5 1981 59–26 69.4% #23 1,902 1 6
28 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5 1982 27–25 51.9% #18 1,708 1 6
29 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5 1983 16–17 48.5% #37 1,687 1 6
30 — — — — — — — 1984 9–18 33.3% #145 1,573 1 6
31 — — — — — — — 1985 9–10 47.4% #115 1,595 1 6
32 — — — — — — — 1986 3–9 25.0% #307 1,539 1 6
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5 1987 1–1 50.0% #523 1,550 1 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Arias Mark Edmondson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 8 4 12 66.7% 19 20 39 48.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1979 4 5 9 44.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 4 5 9 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 14 8 22 63.6% 9 9 18 50.0% 25 4 29 86.2% 11 5 16 68.8%
28 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1982 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 8 16 50.0%
29 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1983 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 7 8 12.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% — 50 58 108 46.3% 59 76 135 43.7% 102 58 160 63.8% 33 39 72 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Arias Mark Edmondson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 101.1 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) 104.8 +1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) 109.5 -0.41 1972 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
19 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 106.2 -2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) 100.9 +1.26 1974 1489 104.0 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.03
21 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 96.7 -0.60 1975 1501 106.2 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.67 1–1 0–1 — +0.53
22 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 99.0 -2.03 1976 1756 137.6 — — — — -128 -137 +160 56.1% +0.33 14–13 (52%) 18–8 (69%) 111.1 +4.22
23 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -0.94 1977 1603 131.0 — — — — -25 +7 +221 47.7% +0.01 4–13 (24%) 3–4 (43%) 91.2 +1.28
24 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) 100.1 -2.89 1978 1686 136.0 — — — — -115 -93 +199 47.3% -0.14 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 -0.12
25 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) 95.7 -1.09 1979 1743 144.3 — — — — -89 -149 +141 51.5% +0.13 7–10 (41%) 7–8 (47%) 96.9 -0.24
26 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) 107.1 +0.40 1980 1715 129.3 — — — — -68 -118 +111 46.5% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 101.8 -1.75
27 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 -0.26 1981 1902 144.4 — — — — -56 -267 +89 62.4% +0.73 23–9 (72%) 20–5 (80%) 117.8 +2.48
28 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34 1982 1709 130.9 — — — — +33 -109 +214 51.2% -0.06 5–5 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 98.0 +0.35
29 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36 1983 1688 128.5 — — — — +28 -69 +179 48.2% -0.14 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 +0.63
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1573 121.2 — — — — -16 +69 +224 39.1% -0.94 2–5 (29%) 5–5 (50%) 94.5 -0.75
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1595 118.9 — — — — — +47 +142 42.9% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) 98.3 +0.58
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1540 111.0 — — — — -29 — +155 30.0% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.4 0.00
33 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03 1987 1550 100.5 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.34
Career — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 — 1927 139.1 — — — — -40 -114 +151 50.9% +0.02 81–74 (52%) 86–63 (58%) 105.9 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.