H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs Marko Ostoja H2H: 3-0
Jimmy Arias holds a 3–0 lead over Marko Ostoja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Arias leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1986 Boston fourth round 6-2 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 1986* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jimmy Arias | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1985* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jimmy Arias | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1982* | South Orange | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jimmy Arias | 6-3 6-0 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | Marko Ostoja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |