H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs Martin Wostenholme H2H: 1-0

Jimmy Arias holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Wostenholme in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jimmy Arias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1986 Washington Open round of 32 7-6 6-1.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
CAN Age 63 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jimmy Arias #21 7-6 6-1 Martin Wostenholme #113 Match data Jul 31, 1986* R32 Washington Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Martin Wostenholme #1,171 #84 265 1,606 44 79 35.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Arias Martin Wostenholme
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0
16 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% #579 1,497 0 0
17 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 1980 0–1 0.0% 1,496 0 0
18 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5
19 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 1982 2–1 66.7% 1,519 0 0
20 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 1983 0–1 0.0% #329 1,501 0 0
21 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1984 2–3 40.0% #186 1,526 0 0
22 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1985 4–8 33.3% #93 1,556 0 0
23 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5 1986 9–18 33.3% #190 1,533 0 0
24 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5 1987 2–7 22.2% #251 1,494 0 0
25 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5 1988 3–4 42.9% #293 1,496 0 0
26 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5 1989 6–8 42.9% #120 1,536 0 0
27 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5 1990 10–19 34.5% #156 1,508 0 0
28 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5 1991 6–7 46.2% #153 1,523 0 0
29 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5 1992 0–1 0.0% #340 1,512 0 0
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Arias Martin Wostenholme
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1982 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1988 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 1989 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1998 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% 16 33 49 32.7% 21 36 57 36.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 6 10 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 63/72 of Jimmy Arias's and 13/14 of Martin Wostenholme's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jimmy Arias Martin Wostenholme
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 39/42 1.8 2.8 69.8% 62.0% 49.5% 56.5% 42.3% 58.2% 41.0% —/—
27 1992 8/12 2.1 2.4 70.1% 61.2% 48.1% 53.6% 48.5% 57.0% 35.3% —/—
28 1993 9/9 1.4 3.6 69.5% 66.8% 47.3% 51.6% 38.0% 60.7% 38.2% 1991 12/13 1.9 2.3 68.1% 64.5% 47.0% 50.5% 47.1% 58.8% 42.6%
29 1994 5/7 2.6 2.6 62.9% 65.2% 48.9% 58.4% 41.0% 58.4% 34.6% 1992 1/1 4.0 7.0 71.0% 63.6% 33.3% 60.0% 50.0% 54.8% 39.7%
33 1998 2/2 1.0 3.5 59.3% 61.1% 46.7% 55.0% 50.0% 55.4% 32.1% —/—
Career 63/498 1.8 2.9 68.9% 62.8% 48.9% 55.6% 42.6% 58.3% 39.1% 13/123 2.1 2.7 68.3% 64.4% 46.0% 51.2% 47.4% 58.4% 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Arias Martin Wostenholme
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1531 118.3 +61 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 +0.21
16 1981 1626 120.1 +15 -65 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 101.1 +1.61 1979 1497 102.6 0.0% -3.00 -0.15
17 1982 1858 146.3 -127 -26 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) 104.8 +1.99 1980 1497 114.0 0.0% -4.00 -0.24
18 1983 2040 155.5 -177 +21 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) 109.5 -0.41
19 1984 1879 150.8 -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 106.2 -2.32 1982 1520 101.6 +44 55.6% 0.00 2–1 (67%) +0.70
20 1985 1812 143.3 +55 +10 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) 100.9 +1.26 1983 1502 95.8 0.0% -3.50 +0.32
21 1986 1669 139.2 +2 +190 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 96.7 -0.60 1984 1526 113.6 +54 33.3% -0.92 2–0 1–1 -0.27
22 1987 1721 145.4 -8 +100 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 99.0 -2.03 1985 1557 128.6 +23 -30 37.5% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.9 +0.06
23 1988 1615 129.7 +8 +119 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -0.94 1986 1533 126.0 -21 +67 +22 36.8% -0.68 3–5 (38%) 1–6 (14%) 96.3 +0.42
24 1989 1696 146.3 -18 +50 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) 100.1 -2.89 1987 1495 96.0 -29 +77 22.2% -2.28 0–1 -0.08
25 1990 1681 136.8 -3 +36 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) 95.7 -1.09 1988 1497 107.0 -8 38.5% -0.46 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.93
26 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) 107.1 +0.40 1989 1537 120.9 -67 +62 45.2% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 2–0 -0.37
27 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 -0.26 1990 1509 115.6 +21 +47 36.6% -1.13 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 98.1 +1.22
28 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.34 1991 1523 103.7 -1.82 +1.47 1.033 50.4% -15 +33 +68 50.0% -0.30 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 +1.29
29 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 +0.36 1992 1512 102.2 -1.95 -1.09 0.880 48.2% 33.3% -0.33 0–1 -0.01
33 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% 0.0% -4.50 -0.03
Career 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 1607 122.6 -1.83 +1.27 1.020 50.3% +2 +55 +45 37.9% -0.89 14–22 (39%) 12–22 (35%) 94.8 +3.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.