H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs Peter Fleming H2H: 0-1

Peter Fleming holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Fleming leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Fleming won the 1987 US Open round of 128 7-6 6-7 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Peter Fleming
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Fleming #97 7-6 6-7 6-2 7-6 Jimmy Arias #41 Match data Sep 3, 1987* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Peter Fleming #933 #8 0 2,050 224 214 51.1% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Arias Peter Fleming
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
18 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5 1973 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
19 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 1975 6–7 46.2% #120 1,542 0 0
21 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1976 15–14 51.7% #116 1,636 0 0
22 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1977 31–28 52.5% #47 1,816 0 0
23 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5 1978 43–31 58.1% #26 1,955 0 1
24 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5 1979 45–26 63.4% #13 1,920 0 3
25 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5 1980 21–19 52.5% #37 1,769 0 3
26 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5 1981 9–13 40.9% #99 1,734 0 3
27 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5 1982 2–6 25.0% — 1,654 0 3
28 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5 1983 14–11 56.0% #32 1,765 0 3
29 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5 1984 18–19 48.6% #51 1,735 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1985 9–12 42.9% #94 1,686 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 1986 6–10 37.5% #103 1,657 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1987 4–13 23.5% #174 1,561 0 3
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Arias Peter Fleming
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1972 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1973 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 11 8 19 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 14 8 22 63.6%
23 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 1978 20 11 31 64.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 9 25 64.0%
24 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 20 7 27 74.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 23 12 35 65.7%
25 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1983 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% — 94 77 171 55.0% 22 36 58 37.9% 18 27 45 40.0% 90 74 164 54.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Arias Peter Fleming
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.99 1972 1495 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
18 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.41 1973 1493 101.0 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
19 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32 1974 1486 109.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — -0.26
20 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) — +1.26 1975 1542 115.0 — — — — +62 -29 — 50.0% +0.04 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.11
21 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.60 1976 1637 132.6 — — — — -4 -61 -52 53.7% +0.48 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — +2.59
22 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.03 1977 1816 148.6 — — — — +64 -251 -244 52.9% +0.24 12–15 (44%) 11–15 (42%) — -2.07
23 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.94 1978 1956 158.7 — — — — +60 -329 -387 55.4% +0.43 19–14 (58%) 11–15 (42%) — -4.63
24 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.89 1979 1920 159.8 — — — — +93 -345 -335 60.1% +0.60 10–7 (59%) 5–13 (28%) — -0.84
25 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.09 1980 1770 138.7 — — — — +76 -207 -83 52.3% +0.24 5–6 (45%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.13
26 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.40 1981 1735 139.0 — — — — +22 — -40 41.5% -0.53 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -2.84
27 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26 1982 1654 112.6 — — — — +28 — — 33.3% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44
28 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34 1983 1766 140.3 — — — — +9 — -91 55.4% +0.31 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.68
29 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36 1984 1735 141.3 — — — — +24 -182 — 47.9% +0.03 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1686 134.6 — — — — +30 — — 50.9% -0.14 1–7 (13%) 5–1 (83%) — -0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1657 132.9 — — — — +2 — — 41.5% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1561 118.4 — — — — +12 — +36 32.6% -1.12 0–5 (0%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55
33 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 — 2050 152.1 — — — — +50 -216 -151 51.5% +0.14 73–84 (46%) 73–84 (46%) 95.4 -1.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.