H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs Ricardo Cano H2H: 0-1

Ricardo Cano holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ricardo Cano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ricardo Cano won the 1981 Forest Hills Wct round of 64 7-6 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Ricardo Cano
ARG Age 75 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ricardo Cano #60 7-6 2-6 6-1 Jimmy Arias Match data May 6, 1981* R64 Forest Hills Wct ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Ricardo Cano #768 #42 0 1,797 140 145 49.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Arias Ricardo Cano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5 — — — — — — —
19 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
21 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1972 2–5 28.6% — 1,477 0 0
22 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1973 1–1 50.0% — 1,489 0 0
23 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5 1974 2–2 50.0% #274 1,503 0 0
24 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5 1975 18–13 58.1% #42 1,738 0 0
25 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5 1976 43–26 62.3% #51 1,732 0 0
26 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5 1977 18–24 42.9% #99 1,674 0 0
27 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5 1978 10–13 43.5% #81 1,632 0 0
28 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5 1979 3–10 23.1% #169 1,566 0 0
29 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5 1980 3–8 27.3% #73 1,543 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1981 33–24 57.9% #62 1,716 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1982 3–11 21.4% #91 1,608 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1983 4–6 40.0% #219 1,580 0 0
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Arias Ricardo Cano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1971 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1976 3 1 4 75.0% 38 23 61 62.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 10 13 23 43.5% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 4 1 5 80.0% 29 22 51 56.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% — 9 8 17 52.9% 128 129 257 49.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Arias Ricardo Cano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) — +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) — +1.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) — -2.32 1970 1494 97.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.67 — — — -0.19
20 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) — +1.26 1971 1490 105.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.20
21 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.60 1972 1477 95.2 — — — — — +34 — 30.0% -1.45 1–1 — — +0.44
22 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.03 1973 1490 106.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
23 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.94 1974 1504 106.5 — — — — — +29 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.69
24 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) — -2.89 1975 1739 141.6 — — — — — +46 — 51.9% +0.06 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.44
25 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.09 1976 1732 133.4 — — — — -109 +26 — 56.2% +0.47 14–8 (64%) 7–4 (64%) — +6.25
26 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — +0.40 1977 1674 138.6 — — — — -85 +10 — 43.4% -0.47 7–7 (50%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.77
27 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26 1978 1632 125.5 — — — — — +5 — 44.6% -0.20 3–2 (60%) 1–1 — +1.33
28 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34 1979 1567 118.1 — — — — — -5 — 36.1% -0.89 2–6 (25%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.24
29 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36 1980 1543 122.9 — — — — — -2 — 37.0% -0.63 1–4 (20%) — — +0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1717 140.9 — — — — -79 +17 — 54.5% +0.30 11–4 (73%) 7–10 (41%) — +1.92
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1608 117.3 — — — — -14 +43 — 26.5% -1.82 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.08
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1581 107.3 — — — — — +48 — 46.4% -0.50 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.87
33 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 — 1797 137.7 — — — — -81 +21 — 47.7% -0.16 51–43 (54%) 33–30 (52%) 106.0 +3.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.