H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 0-1
Roscoe Tanner holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roscoe Tanner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1980 US Open second round 6-3 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1980* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Roscoe Tanner | 6-3 6-3 6-0 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |