H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs T. Tulasne H2H: 1-3
T. Tulasne holds a 3–1 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, T. Tulasne leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, T. Tulasne won the 1986 Washington semifinal 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1986* | Washington | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | T. Tulasne | 7-5 6-0 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1986 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | T. Tulasne | 7-6 6-0 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1986* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | T. Tulasne | 6-3 6-4 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| May 14, 1983* | Florence | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jimmy Arias | 6-4 6-1 | T. Tulasne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| T. Tulasne | #1,117 | #10 | 334 | 1,937 | 215 | 206 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | T. Tulasne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #113 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,878 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #20 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #127 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #158 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,493 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |