H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jimmy Arias vs Vijay Amritraj H2H: 2-1
Jimmy Arias holds a 2–1 lead over Vijay Amritraj in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Arias leads 2–0 on carpet, while Vijay Amritraj leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Arias won the 1984 Richmond Wct fourth round 1-6 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
IND
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1984* | Richmond Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jimmy Arias | 1-6 7-5 7-6 | Vijay Amritraj | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1982* | Baltimore Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jimmy Arias | 6-3 6-3 | Vijay Amritraj | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1980* | Stowe | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Vijay Amritraj | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Vijay Amritraj | #1,178 | #18 | 69 | 2,005 | 390 | 294 | 57.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 16 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jimmy Arias | Vijay Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 9–13 | 40.9% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 | 1973 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 48–28 | 63.2% | #39 | 1,810 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #29 | 1,945 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #31 | 1,831 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #46 | 1,795 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #58 | 1,763 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,822 | 0 | 12 |
| 26 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #19 | 1,982 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #20 | 1,904 | 0 | 14 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,843 | 0 | 14 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #382 | 1,685 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #80 | 1,698 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #106 | 1,685 | 0 | 16 |
| 33 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #221 | 1,676 | 0 | 16 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,660 | 0 | 16 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #280 | 1,606 | 0 | 16 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #687 | 1,542 | 0 | 16 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,528 | 0 | 16 |