H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Arias vs Yannick Noah H2H: 1-3

Yannick Noah holds a 3–1 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Yannick Noah leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yannick Noah won the 1985 Stockholm Open round of 32 6-2 5-7 7-6.

USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 66 Right-Handed 194 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yannick Noah #7 6-2 5-7 7-6 Jimmy Arias #23 Match data Nov 7, 1985* R32 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Yannick Noah #5 6-4 4-6 6-4 Jimmy Arias #6 Match data Feb 18, 1984* SF La Quinta ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Arias 7-6 4-6 6-3 1-6 7-5 Yannick Noah Match data Sep 10, 1983* QF US Open Grand Slam Hard
Yannick Noah #12 6-3 6-3 Jimmy Arias #39 Match data Jul 31, 1982* QF South Orange ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5
Yannick Noah #1,303 #3 1,079 2,199 456 194 70.2% 1 0 0 1 21 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Arias Yannick Noah
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0
16 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0
17 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1 1977 0–1 0.0% #269 1,491 0 0
18 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5 1978 23–14 62.2% #49 1,708 0 2
19 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5 1979 34–14 70.8% #26 1,933 0 5
20 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5 1980 29–16 64.4% #18 1,890 0 5
21 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5 1981 51–18 73.9% #13 1,917 0 7
22 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5 1982 50–12 80.6% #10 2,086 0 11
23 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5 1983 36–9 80.0% #5 2,087 1 14
24 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5 1984 23–10 69.7% #9 1,997 1 14
25 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5 1985 50–17 74.6% #7 1,956 1 17
26 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5 1986 43–14 75.4% #4 2,012 1 19
27 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5 1987 34–13 72.3% #8 1,951 1 21
28 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5 1988 32–10 76.2% #12 1,948 1 22
29 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5 1989 21–14 60.0% #16 1,876 1 22
30 1990 22–21 51.2% #40 1,708 1 23
31 1991 7–7 50.0% #188 1,708 1 23
33 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5
35 1995 1–3 25.0% #552 1,686 1 23
36 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,672 1 23

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Arias Yannick Noah
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1977 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1979 13 5 18 72.2% 16 4 20 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1980 11 5 16 68.8% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 10 6 16 62.5% 22 6 28 78.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 18 4 22 81.8%
22 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 19 1 20 95.0% 29 7 36 80.6% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 23 2 25 92.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 9 3 12 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 21 7 28 75.0% 20 4 24 83.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3%
26 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 1986 15 5 20 75.0% 17 3 20 85.0% 11 6 17 64.7%
27 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1987 13 2 15 86.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
28 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 9 3 12 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 2 11 81.8%
29 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 16 8 24 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
30 1990 16 7 23 69.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
31 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1998 1 1 2 50.0%
35 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 1996 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1% 164 62 226 72.6% 202 66 268 75.4% 11 16 27 40.7% 79 50 129 61.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Arias Yannick Noah
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1531 118.3 +61 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) +0.21
16 1981 1626 120.1 +15 -65 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) +1.61
17 1982 1858 146.3 -127 -26 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) +1.99 1977 1491 103.3 40.0% -2.00 0–1 2–0 -0.08
18 1983 2040 155.5 -177 +21 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) -0.41 1978 1709 137.9 -111 +56 -173 57.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 10–6 (63%) +3.56
19 1984 1879 150.8 -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) -2.32 1979 1933 150.7 -105 +27 -371 65.1% +1.08 9–4 (69%) 10–9 (53%) +0.67
20 1985 1812 143.3 +55 +10 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) +1.26 1980 1890 153.0 +5 +91 -340 59.5% +0.98 9–6 (60%) 6–8 (43%) -3.05
21 1986 1669 139.2 +2 +190 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) -0.60 1981 1917 156.5 +62 +116 -384 64.4% +1.04 17–4 (81%) 9–12 (43%) -1.67
22 1987 1721 145.4 -8 +100 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) -2.03 1982 2086 164.7 -20 +30 74.0% +1.55 12–5 (71%) 9–6 (60%) -3.56
23 1988 1615 129.7 +8 +119 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) -0.94 1983 2087 162.3 -135 +184 74.8% +1.72 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) -1.85
24 1989 1696 146.3 -18 +50 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) -2.89 1984 1998 159.6 -11 +206 65.9% +0.83 8–5 (62%) 9–3 (75%) -2.14
25 1990 1681 136.8 -3 +36 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) -1.09 1985 1957 156.2 -10 +205 -368 68.4% +1.11 12–6 (67%) 18–12 (60%) -0.87
26 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) +0.40 1986 2013 163.9 -41 +208 67.8% +1.19 13–5 (72%) 12–17 (41%) -2.21
27 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) -0.26 1987 1951 147.7 +93 +140 -296 65.0% +1.00 11–4 (73%) 8–9 (47%) +1.55
28 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 +0.34 1988 1949 153.8 +75 +116 67.2% +1.03 12–4 (75%) 15–11 (58%) -0.74
29 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 +0.36 1989 1877 147.3 +46 56.2% +0.40 10–4 (71%) 10–12 (45%) -0.89
30 1990 1708 139.1 +109 +162 49.1% -0.16 8–6 (57%) 10–9 (53%) -1.00
31 1991 1709 127.3 -0.35 -2.54 0.863 47.8% +60 +151 48.5% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 2–0 -0.03
33 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% 0.0% -4.50 -0.03
35 1995 1686 117.0 -0.18 -0.05 0.814 46.1% +61 25.0% -1.38 1–1 -0.54
36 1996 1672 104.2 -2.25 +2.64 0.506 43.1% 33.3% -1.33 0–1 -0.10
Career 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89 2199 161.2 -0.42 -1.70 0.835 47.2% +9 +121 -314 64.2% +0.93 138–68 (67%) 139–119 (54%) 101.7 -2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.