H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs David Pate H2H: 3-1

Jimmy Connors holds a 3–1 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Pate won the 1988 Orlando third round 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 1988* Orlando ATP 250 R32 Hard David Pate #20 3-6 6-4 6-3 Jimmy Connors #5 Match data
Mar 1, 1986* La Quinta ATP 250 QF Hard Jimmy Connors #4 7-5 6-4 David Pate #31 Match data
Apr 5, 1985* Chicago ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jimmy Connors #2 6-4 7-6 David Pate #27 Match data
Sep 15, 1984* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Jimmy Connors #3 7-5 6-2 David Pate #126 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,874 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Connors David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,741 0 1
24 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,787 0 1
25 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,751 0 2
26 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,716 0 2
27 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,595 0 2
30 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,572 0 2
31 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,547 0 2
32 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,560 0 2
33 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,541 0 2
34 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105 — — — — — — —
35 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107 — — — — — — —
36 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109 — — — — — — —
37 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109 — — — — — — —
38 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109 — — — — — — —
39 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109 — — — — — — —
40 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109 — — — — — — —
41 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109 — — — — — — —
42 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109 — — — — — — —
43 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109 — — — — — — —