H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs David Pate H2H: 3-1

Jimmy Connors holds a 3–1 lead over David Pate in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, David Pate won the 1988 Orlando round of 32 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #20 3-6 6-4 6-3 Jimmy Connors #5 Match data Mar 10, 1988* R32 Orlando ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Connors #4 7-5 6-4 David Pate #31 Match data Mar 1, 1986* QF La Quinta ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Connors #2 6-4 7-6 David Pate #27 Match data Apr 5, 1985* R16 Chicago ATP 250 Carpet
Jimmy Connors #3 7-5 6-2 David Pate #126 Match data Sep 15, 1984* QF Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,441 1,266 298 80.9% 8 0 1 0 100 109
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Connors David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,773 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,995 0 6 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,156 0 17 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,327 3 32 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,299 3 41 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1976 98–9 91.6% #1 2,386 4 53 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1
24 1977 70–16 81.4% #1 2,342 4 61 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1
25 1978 68–7 90.7% #1 2,385 5 71 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2
26 1979 79–13 85.9% #2 2,309 5 79 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2
27 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,208 5 85 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,169 5 89 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,282 7 96 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2
30 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,200 8 100 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2
31 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,242 8 105 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2
32 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,155 8 105 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2
33 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,015 8 105 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2
34 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,987 8 105 — — — — — — —
35 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,036 8 107 — — — — — — —
36 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,962 8 109 — — — — — — —
37 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,885 8 109 — — — — — — —
38 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,889 8 109 — — — — — — —
39 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,784 8 109 — — — — — — —
40 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,724 8 109 — — — — — — —
41 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,687 8 109 — — — — — — —
42 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,678 8 109 — — — — — — —
43 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,669 8 109 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Connors David Pate
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 25 8 33 75.8% 18 7 25 72.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 23 7 30 76.7% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 46 3 49 93.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 15 4 19 78.9% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1974 20 1 21 95.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 29 1 30 96.7% 37 2 39 94.9% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1975 15 1 16 93.8% 22 2 24 91.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 28 4 32 87.5% 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1976 20 3 23 87.0% 29 3 32 90.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 40 2 42 95.2% 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 18 5 23 78.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 29 7 36 80.6% 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
25 1978 18 1 19 94.7% 13 1 14 92.9% 12 1 13 92.3% 25 4 29 86.2% 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1979 33 3 36 91.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 28 6 34 82.4% 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1980 17 3 20 85.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 33 5 38 86.8% 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1981 22 4 26 84.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 17 4 21 81.0% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1982 36 4 40 90.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 13 0 13 100.0% 22 5 27 81.5% 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 1983 25 5 30 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1984 30 4 34 88.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 21 4 25 84.0% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 16 6 22 72.7% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 33 10 43 76.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 25 6 31 80.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1991 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 506 112 618 81.9% 210 61 271 77.5% 174 38 212 82.1% 376 87 463 81.2% — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Connors David Pate
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1480 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1558 114.8 — — — — +95 — -49 50.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 1773 125.8 — — — — +97 -248 — 59.6% +0.63 9–5 (64%) 7–9 (44%) — +2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1996 147.3 — — — — +64 -226 -238 69.4% +1.26 18–15 (55%) 14–11 (56%) — +3.34 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08
20 1973 2156 156.4 — — — — +95 -299 -234 78.6% +2.04 14–9 (61%) 13–11 (54%) — 0.00 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29
21 1974 2327 156.3 — — — — +66 -370 -5 85.9% +2.48 15–3 (83%) 15–8 (65%) — +2.36 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28
22 1975 2299 164.9 — — — — +130 -149 -31 84.5% +2.56 12–2 (86%) 8–3 (73%) — -0.69 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
23 1976 2386 175.3 — — — — +105 -35 -92 87.1% +2.45 13–4 (76%) 20–6 (77%) — -2.86 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85
24 1977 2343 176.2 — — — — +110 -49 -30 79.1% +2.09 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) — -3.18 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85
25 1978 2385 171.9 — — — — +38 -56 -52 86.1% +2.37 10–3 (77%) 7–3 (70%) — -2.85 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04
26 1979 2310 177.1 — — — — +78 +55 +47 77.6% +1.93 16–3 (84%) 12–8 (60%) — -4.08 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56
27 1980 2209 172.6 — — — — +167 -11 +152 78.2% +2.18 11–6 (65%) 16–12 (57%) — -2.66 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42
28 1981 2170 172.7 — — — — +131 +7 +149 76.1% +1.96 11–4 (73%) 10–8 (56%) — -3.29 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85
29 1982 2282 171.6 — — — — +42 -144 +139 81.8% +2.33 11–2 (85%) 15–5 (75%) — -4.60 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86
30 1983 2200 169.8 — — — — +74 -86 +260 78.1% +2.05 6–2 (75%) 10–3 (77%) — -3.68 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43
31 1984 2243 172.5 — — — — +36 -114 +203 77.6% +1.88 14–6 (70%) 14–7 (67%) — -6.13 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22
32 1985 2155 161.7 — — — — +58 -25 +241 74.1% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 8–3 (73%) — -3.15 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12
33 1986 2015 156.9 — — — — +63 — +293 68.8% +1.35 15–5 (75%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.10 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14
34 1987 1987 161.0 — — — — +39 +104 +276 67.2% +1.33 12–3 (80%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 2036 157.7 — — — — +53 — +97 76.9% +1.99 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1963 149.7 — — — — +100 +14 — 66.4% +1.25 6–4 (60%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1990 1886 104.1 — — — — +80 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–2 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1991 1889 146.4 -1.80 +3.12 1.005 50.1% +29 +62 +178 57.1% +0.30 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) — -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 1785 141.4 -1.86 +2.27 0.962 49.5% +35 +121 — 51.8% +0.05 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) — -2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1993 1724 107.2 -2.74 +0.29 0.890 47.1% +57 — — 37.5% -0.69 2–0 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1994 1687 107.8 -2.12 +0.37 0.980 49.9% — — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1995 1678 102.2 -1.10 +0.01 0.912 49.1% — — +305 50.0% +0.25 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1996 1669 100.0 +0.85 +1.29 0.725 44.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2442 169.4 -1.84 +2.23 0.967 49.5% +78 -89 +40 75.9% +1.82 236–106 (69%) 218–151 (59%) 99.9 -2.45 — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.