H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs Johan Kriek H2H: 7-2

Jimmy Connors holds a 7–2 lead over Johan Kriek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 4–2 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1989 Scottsdale third round 6-4 4-6 6-4.

USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 9, 1989* Scottsdale ATP 250 R32 Hard Johan Kriek #39 6-4 4-6 6-4 Jimmy Connors #8 Match data
Mar 30, 1985* Fort Myers ATP 250 QF Hard Jimmy Connors #2 6-3 6-2 Johan Kriek #14 Match data
Nov 3, 1984* Stockholm ATP 250 QF Hard Jimmy Connors #2 4-6 6-3 6-4 Johan Kriek #12 Match data
Apr 1, 1984* Boca West ATP 250 F Hard Jimmy Connors #3 7-5 6-4 Johan Kriek #13 Match data
Apr 16, 1983* Los Angeles ATP 250 SF Hard Johan Kriek #17 2-6 6-4 6-4 Jimmy Connors #2 Match data
Jan 24, 1983* Masters ATP Finals QF Carpet Jimmy Connors #2 7-6 6-2 Johan Kriek #12 Match data
Feb 28, 1982* Monterrey ATP 250 F Carpet Jimmy Connors #2 6-2 3-6 6-3 Johan Kriek #10 Match data
Aug 18, 1979* Stowe ATP 250 SF Hard Jimmy Connors #2 6-3 6-0 Johan Kriek #32 Match data
Jul 1, 1979* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Jimmy Connors #1 6-4 6-1 7-6 Johan Kriek #31 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,052 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Connors Johan Kriek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
17 1970 5–4 55.6% 1,557 0 0
18 1971 23–13 63.9% 1,769 0 0
19 1972 76–25 75.2% 1,991 0 6 1977 1–2 33.3% #278 1,510 0 0
20 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,781 0 0
21 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,879 0 1
22 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,976 0 1
23 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,955 1 4
24 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,960 2 7
25 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,952 2 10
26 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,916 2 12
27 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,907 2 13
28 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,880 2 13
29 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,737 2 14
30 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,788 2 14
31 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14
32 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14
33 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14
34 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14
35 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109