H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs Mark Cox H2H: 6-2

Jimmy Connors holds a 6–2 lead over Mark Cox in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 3–0 on carpet and 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1979 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors

USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H

6 – 2

8 main draw meetings

Mark Cox

GBR Age 83 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Jul 4, 1979*	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	R16	Grass	Jimmy Connors #1	6-2 6-1 6-1	Mark Cox #98	Match data
Mar 4, 1978*	Memphis	ATP 250	QF	Carpet	Jimmy Connors #1	6-4 3-6 6-2	Mark Cox #23	Match data
Nov 12, 1976*	Stockholm	ATP 250	SF	Hard	Mark Cox #40	7-6 3-6 7-6	Jimmy Connors #1	Match data
Jun 29, 1975*	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	R32	Grass	Jimmy Connors #1	6-4 6-2 6-2	Mark Cox #26	Match data
Dec 2, 1973*	Johannesburg	ATP 250	QF	Hard	Jimmy Connors #3	6-3 6-4 6-4	Mark Cox #21	Match data
Nov 17, 1973	London	ATP 250	BR	Carpet	Jimmy Connors #4	6-3 6-3	Mark Cox #19	Match data
Oct 12, 1973*	Quebec	ATP 250	SF	Carpet	Jimmy Connors #5	7-6 6-2	Mark Cox #19	Match data
Sep 4, 1970*	US Open	Grand Slam	R128	Grass	Mark Cox	6-2 6-4 6-2	Jimmy Connors	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Jimmy Connors	#1,295	#1	875	2,410	1,262	294	81.1%	8	1	1	0	99	109
Mark Cox	#486	#12	0	2,009	408	274	59.8%	0	0	0	0	15	15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Jimmy Connors							Mark Cox
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,480	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1970	5–4	55.6%	—	1,557	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1971	23–13	63.9%	—	1,769	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1972	76–25	75.2%	—	1,991	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1973	86–16	84.3%	#3	2,152	0	17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1974	95–6	94.1%	#1	2,301	3	32	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	1975	79–10	88.8%	#1	2,260	3	41	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1976	97–8	92.4%	#1	2,370	4	53	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1977	69–15	82.1%	#1	2,271	4	61	1968	52–23	69.3%	—	1,722	0	2
25	1978	67–6	91.8%	#1	2,326	5	71	1969	35–16	68.6%	—	1,836	0	4
26	1979	78–12	86.7%	#2	2,272	5	79	1970	39–31	55.7%	—	1,796	0	5
27	1980	73–15	83.0%	#3	2,197	5	85	1971	27–31	46.6%	—	1,815	0	5
28	1981	59–12	83.1%	#2	2,162	5	89	1972	43–29	59.7%	—	1,871	0	7
29	1982	78–11	87.6%	#2	2,263	7	96	1973	56–28	66.7%	#22	1,890	0	10
30	1983	52–11	82.5%	#3	2,193	8	100	1974	25–17	59.5%	#30	1,828	0	10
31	1984	69–12	85.2%	#2	2,240	8	105	1975	31–13	70.5%	#25	1,915	0	13
32	1985	45–15	75.0%	#4	2,133	8	105	1976	22–15	59.5%	#17	1,954	0	14
33	1986	46–15	75.4%	#8	2,013	8	105	1977	35–21	62.5%	#26	1,823	0	15
34	1987	52–19	73.2%	#4	1,985	8	105	1978	15–16	48.4%	#68	1,765	0	15
35	1988	40–11	78.4%	#7	2,020	8	107	1979	17–16	51.5%	#76	1,786	0	15
36	1989	31–13	70.5%	#14	1,957	8	109	1980	11–13	45.8%	#140	1,673	0	15
37	1990	0–3	0.0%	#936	1,881	8	109	1981	0–5	0.0%	#140	1,597	0	15
38	1991	19–14	57.6%	#49	1,887	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	1992	17–16	51.5%	#84	1,774	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	1993	3–5	37.5%	#370	1,717	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	1994	1–3	25.0%	#672	1,681	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
42	1995	2–2	50.0%	#419	1,673	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
43	1996	0–1	0.0%	#1300	1,665	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—