H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 6-0

Jimmy Connors holds a 6–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1983 Las Vegas final 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors

USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H

6 – 0

6 main draw meetings

Mark Edmondson

AUS Age 72 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Apr 30, 1983*	Las Vegas	ATP 250	F	Hard	Jimmy Connors #3	7-6 6-1	Mark Edmondson #23	Match data
Jul 4, 1982*	Wimbledon	Grand Slam	SF	Grass	Jimmy Connors #3	6-4 6-3 6-1	Mark Edmondson #19	Match data
Jun 12, 1982*	Queen's Club	ATP 250	QF	Grass	Jimmy Connors #3	6-1 6-2	Mark Edmondson #18	Match data
May 14, 1981*	Hamburg	ATP 250	R32	Clay	Jimmy Connors #3	3-6 6-3 6-4	Mark Edmondson #73	Match data
Aug 6, 1979	Indianapolis	ATP 250	R64	Clay	Jimmy Connors #2	6-4 7-5	Mark Edmondson #73	Match data
Oct 26, 1978*	Sydney Indoor	ATP 250	R16	Hard	Jimmy Connors #1	6-2 6-2	Mark Edmondson #61	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Jimmy Connors	#1,295	#1	875	2,410	1,262	294	81.1%	8	1	1	0	99	109
Mark Edmondson	#525	#15	0	1,927	244	231	51.4%	1	0	0	0	5	6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Jimmy Connors							Mark Edmondson
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,480	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1970	5–4	55.6%	—	1,557	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1971	23–13	63.9%	—	1,769	0	0	1972	0–1	0.0%	—	1,496	0	0
19	1972	76–25	75.2%	—	1,991	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1973	86–16	84.3%	#3	2,152	0	17	1974	1–2	33.3%	—	1,488	0	0
21	1974	95–6	94.1%	#1	2,301	3	32	1975	2–4	33.3%	#212	1,501	0	0
22	1975	79–10	88.8%	#1	2,260	3	41	1976	42–29	59.2%	#35	1,754	1	2
23	1976	97–8	92.4%	#1	2,370	4	53	1977	16–24	40.0%	#99	1,598	1	2
24	1977	69–15	82.1%	#1	2,271	4	61	1978	15–16	48.4%	#79	1,682	1	3
25	1978	67–6	91.8%	#1	2,326	5	71	1979	26–26	50.0%	#95	1,740	1	3
26	1979	78–12	86.7%	#2	2,272	5	79	1980	18–23	43.9%	#91	1,714	1	3
27	1980	73–15	83.0%	#3	2,197	5	85	1981	59–26	69.4%	#23	1,902	1	6
28	1981	59–12	83.1%	#2	2,162	5	89	1982	27–25	51.9%	#18	1,713	1	6
29	1982	78–11	87.6%	#2	2,263	7	96	1983	16–17	48.5%	#37	1,687	1	6
30	1983	52–11	82.5%	#3	2,193	8	100	1984	9–18	33.3%	#145	1,572	1	6
31	1984	69–12	85.2%	#2	2,240	8	105	1985	9–10	47.4%	#115	1,595	1	6
32	1985	45–15	75.0%	#4	2,133	8	105	1986	3–9	25.0%	#307	1,540	1	6
33	1986	46–15	75.4%	#8	2,013	8	105	1987	1–1	50.0%	#523	1,550	1	6
34	1987	52–19	73.2%	#4	1,985	8	105	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1988	40–11	78.4%	#7	2,020	8	107	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1989	31–13	70.5%	#14	1,957	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1990	0–3	0.0%	#936	1,881	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	1991	19–14	57.6%	#49	1,887	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	1992	17–16	51.5%	#84	1,774	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	1993	3–5	37.5%	#370	1,717	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	1994	1–3	25.0%	#672	1,681	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
42	1995	2–2	50.0%	#419	1,673	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
43	1996	0–1	0.0%	#1300	1,665	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—