Home
/
H2H
/
Jimmy Connors vs Sandy Mayer
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Jimmy Connors vs Sandy Mayer H2H: 17-2
Jimmy Connors holds a 17–2 lead over Sandy Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 19 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 8–2 on hard courts and 9–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sandy Mayer won the 1983 Dallas quarterfinal 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups?
Advanced rivalry search
lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
17
–
2
19 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
Player Score Player Match Data Date Round Tournament Category Surface
Sandy Mayer
#20
6-4 7-5
Jimmy Connors
#3
Match data
Sep 17, 1983*
QF
Dallas
ATP 250
Hard
Jimmy Connors
#3
6-2 6-2
Sandy Mayer
#21
Match data
Aug 21, 1983*
QF
Cincinnati Open
ATP 500
Hard
Jimmy Connors
#2
2-6 6-3 6-4
Sandy Mayer
#26
Match data
Apr 16, 1983*
QF
Los Angeles Open
ATP 250
Hard
Jimmy Connors
#1
4-6 6-2 6-1
Sandy Mayer
#12
Match data
Sep 25, 1982*
SF
San Francisco
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
#2
4-6 6-2 6-1
Sandy Mayer
#7
Match data
Apr 30, 1982*
SF
Las Vegas
ATP 250
Hard
Sandy Mayer
#24
6-3 6-3
Jimmy Connors
#4
Match data
Nov 7, 1981*
SF
Stockholm Open
ATP 250
Hard
Jimmy Connors
#3
6-4 6-3
Sandy Mayer
#40
Match data
Mar 21, 1981*
QF
ABN AMRO Open
ATP 250
Hard
Jimmy Connors
#3
6-2 6-2
Sandy Mayer
#48
Match data
Mar 14, 1981*
SF
Brussels
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
#3
6-4 6-1
Sandy Mayer
#45
Match data
Oct 30, 1980*
R32
Tokyo Indoor
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
#1
6-3 6-2
Sandy Mayer
#19
Match data
Mar 3, 1979*
QF
Memphis
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
6-1 6-1
Sandy Mayer
Match data
Mar 24, 1976*
R64
Indian Wells Open
ATP 250
Hard
Jimmy Connors
6-7(2) 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-2
Sandy Mayer
Match data
Feb 19, 1976*
SF
Salisbury
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
6-1 6-0
Sandy Mayer
Match data
Oct 11, 1975*
F
Maui
ATP 250
Hard
Jimmy Connors
#1
6-4 6-1
Sandy Mayer
#33
Match data
Apr 19, 1975*
SF
Denver Wct
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
7-5 6-3 6-2
Sandy Mayer
Match data
Feb 15, 1975*
SF
Salisbury
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
6-1 6-1 6-0
Sandy Mayer
Match data
Mar 1, 1974*
SF
Salisbury
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
7-5 6-3
Sandy Mayer
Match data
Feb 17, 1974*
F
Birmingham
ATP 250
Carpet
Jimmy Connors
7-5 6-2
Sandy Mayer
Match data
Mar 14, 1973*
QF
Paramus
ATP 250
Hard
Jimmy Connors
6-4 7-5
Sandy Mayer
Match data
Jan 9, 1973*
F
Baltimore
ATP 250
Hard
*
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category.
Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories.
Mapping details.
Career Comparison
Player
Current
Peak
Pts
Elo
W
L
Win %
GS
1000* including documented historical predecessor categories
Finals
500* including documented historical predecessor categories
250* including documented historical predecessor categories
Titles
Jimmy Connors
#1,295
#1
875
2,441
1,266
298
80.9%
8
0
1
0
100
109
Sandy Mayer
#508
#7
0
2,080
371
205
64.4%
0
0
0
0
12
12
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
Yr W-L Win % Rank Elo GS Titles
16
1969
0–1
0.0%
—
1,480
0
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17
1970
5–4
55.6%
—
1,557
0
0
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
1971
23–13
63.9%
—
1,773
0
0
1970
1–2
33.3%
—
1,483
0
0
19
1972
76–25
75.2%
—
1,995
0
6
1971
1–4
20.0%
—
1,455
0
0
20
1973
86–16
84.3%
#3
2,156
0
17
1972
13–8
61.9%
—
1,650
0
0
21
1974
95–6
94.1%
#1
2,327
3
32
1973
30–13
69.8%
#134
1,813
0
2
22
1975
79–10
88.8%
#1
2,299
3
41
1974
29–10
74.4%
#55
1,875
0
5
23
1976
98–9
91.6%
#1
2,386
4
53
1975
47–23
67.1%
#28
1,939
0
5
24
1977
70–16
81.4%
#1
2,342
4
61
1976
13–15
46.4%
#75
1,877
0
5
25
1978
68–7
90.7%
#1
2,385
5
71
1977
39–14
73.6%
#16
1,995
0
8
26
1979
79–13
85.9%
#2
2,309
5
79
1978
41–20
67.2%
#17
1,936
0
9
27
1980
73–15
83.0%
#3
2,208
5
85
1979
15–12
55.6%
#44
1,902
0
9
28
1981
59–12
83.1%
#2
2,169
5
89
1980
17–18
48.6%
#51
1,835
0
9
29
1982
78–11
87.6%
#2
2,282
7
96
1981
42–16
72.4%
#14
2,048
0
10
30
1983
52–11
82.5%
#3
2,200
8
100
1982
38–19
66.7%
#16
1,912
0
11
31
1984
69–12
85.2%
#2
2,242
8
105
1983
33–17
66.0%
#18
1,935
0
12
32
1985
45–15
75.0%
#4
2,155
8
105
1984
10–11
47.6%
#117
1,806
0
12
33
1986
46–15
75.4%
#8
2,015
8
105
1985
2–3
40.0%
#309
1,795
0
12
34
1987
52–19
73.2%
#4
1,987
8
105
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
35
1988
40–11
78.4%
#7
2,036
8
107
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
36
1989
31–13
70.5%
#14
1,962
8
109
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
37
1990
0–3
0.0%
#936
1,885
8
109
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
38
1991
19–14
57.6%
#49
1,889
8
109
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
39
1992
17–16
51.5%
#84
1,784
8
109
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
40
1993
3–5
37.5%
#370
1,724
8
109
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
41
1994
1–3
25.0%
#672
1,687
8
109
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
42
1995
2–2
50.0%
#419
1,678
8
109
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
43
1996
0–1
0.0%
#1300
1,669
8
109
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year.
Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
Yr
Yr
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
W
L
M
Win %
16
1969
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
17
1970
3
2
5
60.0%
—
—
—
—
2
2
4
50.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18
1971
19
7
26
73.1%
2
3
5
40.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
1
1
2
50.0%
1970
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
2
3
33.3%
—
—
—
—
19
1972
25
8
33
75.8%
18
7
25
72.0%
10
3
13
76.9%
23
7
30
76.7%
1971
0
1
1
0.0%
1
2
3
33.3%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
20
1973
46
3
49
93.9%
12
5
17
70.6%
13
4
17
76.5%
15
4
19
78.9%
1972
1
1
2
50.0%
6
4
10
60.0%
5
2
7
71.4%
1
1
2
50.0%
21
1974
20
1
21
95.2%
9
2
11
81.8%
29
1
30
96.7%
37
2
39
94.9%
1973
14
6
20
70.0%
7
2
9
77.8%
8
4
12
66.7%
1
1
2
50.0%
22
1975
15
1
16
93.8%
22
2
24
91.7%
14
3
17
82.4%
28
4
32
87.5%
1974
6
2
8
75.0%
—
—
—
—
5
3
8
62.5%
18
5
23
78.3%
23
1976
20
3
23
87.0%
29
3
32
90.6%
9
1
10
90.0%
40
2
42
95.2%
1975
17
7
24
70.8%
6
7
13
46.2%
3
2
5
60.0%
21
7
28
75.0%
24
1977
16
2
18
88.9%
18
5
23
78.3%
7
2
9
77.8%
29
7
36
80.6%
1976
4
4
8
50.0%
—
—
—
—
1
3
4
25.0%
8
8
16
50.0%
25
1978
18
1
19
94.7%
13
1
14
92.9%
12
1
13
92.3%
25
4
29
86.2%
1977
15
5
20
75.0%
—
—
—
—
3
1
4
75.0%
21
8
29
72.4%
26
1979
33
3
36
91.7%
13
3
16
81.3%
5
1
6
83.3%
28
6
34
82.4%
1978
4
4
8
50.0%
3
1
4
75.0%
8
2
10
80.0%
26
13
39
66.7%
27
1980
17
3
20
85.0%
18
6
24
75.0%
5
1
6
83.3%
33
5
38
86.8%
1979
2
3
5
40.0%
4
4
8
50.0%
6
2
8
75.0%
3
3
6
50.0%
28
1981
22
4
26
84.6%
15
3
18
83.3%
5
1
6
83.3%
17
4
21
81.0%
1980
9
6
15
60.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
7
6
13
53.8%
1
4
5
20.0%
29
1982
36
4
40
90.0%
7
2
9
77.8%
13
0
13
100.0%
22
5
27
81.5%
1981
22
8
30
73.3%
2
1
3
66.7%
3
1
4
75.0%
15
6
21
71.4%
30
1983
25
5
30
83.3%
4
1
5
80.0%
9
1
10
90.0%
14
4
18
77.8%
1982
10
5
15
66.7%
10
3
13
76.9%
3
2
5
60.0%
15
9
24
62.5%
31
1984
30
4
34
88.2%
8
2
10
80.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
21
4
25
84.0%
1983
16
8
24
66.7%
6
1
7
85.7%
4
1
5
80.0%
7
7
14
50.0%
32
1985
18
6
24
75.0%
8
2
10
80.0%
5
2
7
71.4%
14
5
19
73.7%
1984
9
6
15
60.0%
1
3
4
25.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
33
1986
25
7
32
78.1%
—
—
—
—
5
2
7
71.4%
16
6
22
72.7%
1985
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
2
2
4
50.0%
34
1987
33
10
43
76.7%
4
1
5
80.0%
10
2
12
83.3%
5
6
11
45.5%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
35
1988
29
7
36
80.6%
—
—
—
—
5
2
7
71.4%
6
2
8
75.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
36
1989
25
6
31
80.6%
5
5
10
50.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
37
1990
0
2
2
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
38
1991
13
7
20
65.0%
2
2
4
50.0%
2
1
3
66.7%
2
4
6
33.3%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
39
1992
15
11
26
57.7%
2
2
4
50.0%
0
1
1
0.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
40
1993
3
3
6
50.0%
0
2
2
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
41
1994
0
1
1
0.0%
1
1
2
50.0%
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
42
1995
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
2
1
3
66.7%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
43
1996
—
—
—
—
0
1
1
0.0%
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Career
—
506
112
618
81.9%
210
61
271
77.5%
174
38
212
82.1%
376
87
463
81.2%
—
129
66
195
66.2%
46
31
77
59.7%
57
33
90
63.3%
139
75
214
65.0%
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.