H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 1-0

Jimmy Connors holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jimmy Connors leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1983 US Open round of 64 6-1 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Thomas Hogstedt
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jimmy Connors #3 6-1 6-2 6-3 Thomas Hogstedt #41 Match data Sep 3, 1983* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,441 1,266 298 80.9% 8 0 1 0 100 109
Thomas Hogstedt #1,032 #38 413 1,736 90 153 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Connors Thomas Hogstedt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1979 1–1 50.0% #368 1,521 0 0
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0
18 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,773 0 0 1982 9–10 47.4% #82 1,589 0 0
19 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,995 0 6 1983 15–16 48.4% #63 1,690 0 1
20 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,156 0 17 1984 10–16 38.5% #84 1,639 0 1
21 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,327 3 32 1985 3–10 23.1% #210 1,520 0 1
22 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,299 3 41 1986 2–8 20.0% #124 1,504 0 1
23 1976 98–9 91.6% #1 2,386 4 53 1987 8–15 34.8% #179 1,495 0 1
24 1977 70–16 81.4% #1 2,342 4 61 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,511 0 1
25 1978 68–7 90.7% #1 2,385 5 71 1989 8–10 44.4% #133 1,607 0 1
26 1979 79–13 85.9% #2 2,309 5 79 1990 12–26 31.6% #91 1,507 0 1
27 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,208 5 85 1991 11–23 32.4% #130 1,537 0 1
28 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,169 5 89 1992 5–8 38.5% #181 1,559 0 1
29 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,282 7 96 1993 0–2 0.0% #306 1,541 0 1
30 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,200 8 100 1994 2–3 40.0% #309 1,555 0 1
31 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,242 8 105 — — — — — — —
32 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,155 8 105 — — — — — — —
33 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,015 8 105 — — — — — — —
34 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,987 8 105 — — — — — — —
35 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,036 8 107 — — — — — — —
36 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,962 8 109 — — — — — — —
37 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,885 8 109 — — — — — — —
38 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,889 8 109 — — — — — — —
39 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,784 8 109 — — — — — — —
40 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,724 8 109 — — — — — — —
41 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,687 8 109 — — — — — — —
42 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,678 8 109 — — — — — — —
43 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,669 8 109 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jimmy Connors Thomas Hogstedt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 1971 19 7 26 73.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1972 25 8 33 75.8% 18 7 25 72.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 23 7 30 76.7% 1983 5 8 13 38.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
20 1973 46 3 49 93.9% 12 5 17 70.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 15 4 19 78.9% 1984 4 7 11 36.4% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5%
21 1974 20 1 21 95.2% 9 2 11 81.8% 29 1 30 96.7% 37 2 39 94.9% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
22 1975 15 1 16 93.8% 22 2 24 91.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 28 4 32 87.5% 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1976 20 3 23 87.0% 29 3 32 90.6% 9 1 10 90.0% 40 2 42 95.2% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 18 5 23 78.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 29 7 36 80.6% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 18 1 19 94.7% 13 1 14 92.9% 12 1 13 92.3% 25 4 29 86.2% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1979 33 3 36 91.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 28 6 34 82.4% 1990 5 16 21 23.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
27 1980 17 3 20 85.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 33 5 38 86.8% 1991 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
28 1981 22 4 26 84.6% 15 3 18 83.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 17 4 21 81.0% 1992 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1982 36 4 40 90.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 13 0 13 100.0% 22 5 27 81.5% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1983 25 5 30 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 14 4 18 77.8% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1984 30 4 34 88.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 21 4 25 84.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 18 6 24 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 25 7 32 78.1% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 16 6 22 72.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 33 10 43 76.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 29 7 36 80.6% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 25 6 31 80.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1991 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 15 11 26 57.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 506 112 618 81.9% 210 61 271 77.5% 174 38 212 82.1% 376 87 463 81.2% — 47 83 130 36.2% 9 24 33 27.3% 2 9 11 18.2% 32 37 69 46.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jimmy Connors Thomas Hogstedt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1521 109.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — -0.23
16 1969 1480 97.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1558 114.8 — — — — +95 — -49 50.0% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.24 1981 1539 106.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.17 — 0–1 — +0.17
18 1971 1773 125.8 — — — — +97 -248 — 59.6% +0.63 9–5 (64%) 7–9 (44%) 101.4 +2.95 1982 1590 118.6 — — — — +14 -47 — 48.9% -0.06 5–4 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 +1.74
19 1972 1996 147.3 — — — — +64 -226 -238 69.4% +1.26 18–15 (55%) 14–11 (56%) 102.1 +3.34 1983 1691 138.1 — — — — +29 -141 — 51.2% -0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–6 (54%) 97.0 +0.67
20 1973 2156 156.4 — — — — +95 -299 -234 78.6% +2.04 14–9 (61%) 13–11 (54%) 98.3 0.00 1984 1639 130.8 — — — — +45 -131 — 42.2% -0.53 4–6 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 98.1 +0.47
21 1974 2327 156.3 — — — — +66 -370 -5 85.9% +2.48 15–3 (83%) 15–8 (65%) 104.4 +2.36 1985 1521 106.8 — — — — +9 — — 28.1% -0.88 2–3 (40%) 0–6 (0%) 92.6 +1.64
22 1975 2299 164.9 — — — — +130 -149 -31 84.5% +2.56 12–2 (86%) 8–3 (73%) 104.2 -0.69 1986 1504 117.7 — — — — +11 -6 — 21.7% -1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 102.0 -0.27
23 1976 2386 175.3 — — — — +105 -35 -92 87.1% +2.45 13–4 (76%) 20–6 (77%) 108.1 -2.86 1987 1495 116.9 — — — — +33 -27 — 35.7% -1.22 4–3 (57%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.07
24 1977 2343 176.2 — — — — +110 -49 -30 79.1% +2.09 12–5 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 -3.18 1988 1512 109.5 — — — — +25 — — 44.4% -0.61 1–1 0–1 — +0.37
25 1978 2385 171.9 — — — — +38 -56 -52 86.1% +2.37 10–3 (77%) 7–3 (70%) 101.5 -2.85 1989 1608 120.3 — — — — -7 — — 43.2% -0.91 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 104.9 -0.52
26 1979 2310 177.1 — — — — +78 +55 +47 77.6% +1.93 16–3 (84%) 12–8 (60%) 103.4 -4.08 1990 1508 117.7 — — — — +38 — +6 37.2% -0.67 6–10 (38%) 7–13 (35%) 94.6 +1.36
27 1980 2209 172.6 — — — — +167 -11 +152 78.2% +2.18 11–6 (65%) 16–12 (57%) 95.4 -2.66 1991 1538 127.2 -2.85 -2.49 0.820 46.5% +39 — — 38.4% -0.93 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 100.3 -0.11
28 1981 2170 172.7 — — — — +131 +7 +149 76.1% +1.96 11–4 (73%) 10–8 (56%) 99.9 -3.29 1992 1559 120.6 -2.70 -1.47 0.819 46.4% +35 — — 39.4% -1.09 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 104.8 +0.16
29 1982 2282 171.6 — — — — +42 -144 +139 81.8% +2.33 11–2 (85%) 15–5 (75%) 105.8 -4.60 1993 1541 99.0 -2.06 +0.48 0.633 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
30 1983 2200 169.8 — — — — +74 -86 +260 78.1% +2.05 6–2 (75%) 10–3 (77%) 102.9 -3.68 1994 1556 115.0 -1.47 +0.36 0.841 47.2% +11 — — 36.4% -1.09 1–0 0–1 — -0.01
31 1984 2243 172.5 — — — — +36 -114 +203 77.6% +1.88 14–6 (70%) 14–7 (67%) 101.2 -6.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 2155 161.7 — — — — +58 -25 +241 74.1% +1.48 6–3 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 99.0 -3.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 2015 156.9 — — — — +63 — +293 68.8% +1.35 15–5 (75%) 10–9 (53%) 96.2 -2.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1987 161.0 — — — — +39 +104 +276 67.2% +1.33 12–3 (80%) 10–11 (48%) 101.5 -1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 2036 157.7 — — — — +53 — +97 76.9% +1.99 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) 93.7 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1963 149.7 — — — — +100 +14 — 66.4% +1.25 6–4 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 93.5 -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1990 1886 104.1 — — — — +80 — — 14.3% -1.43 0–1 0–2 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1991 1889 146.4 -1.80 +3.12 1.005 50.1% +29 +62 +178 57.1% +0.30 7–5 (58%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 1785 141.4 -1.86 +2.27 0.962 49.5% +35 +121 — 51.8% +0.05 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 97.8 -2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1993 1724 107.2 -2.74 +0.29 0.890 47.1% +57 — — 37.5% -0.69 2–0 0–2 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1994 1687 107.8 -2.12 +0.37 0.980 49.9% — — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 0–1 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1995 1678 102.2 -1.10 +0.01 0.912 49.1% — — +305 50.0% +0.25 — 2–1 (67%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 1996 1669 100.0 +0.85 +1.29 0.725 44.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2442 169.4 -1.84 +2.23 0.967 49.5% +78 -89 +40 75.9% +1.82 236–106 (69%) 218–151 (59%) 99.9 -2.45 — 1737 130.3 -2.63 -1.81 0.811 46.3% +28 -74 +6 40.4% -0.73 37–44 (46%) 42–54 (44%) 100.1 +2.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.