H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs Tom Okker H2H: 6-2

Jimmy Connors holds a 6–2 lead over Tom Okker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 3–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1976 Nottingham quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Tom Okker
NED Age 82 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 1976* Nottingham ATP 250 QF Grass Jimmy Connors #1 6-2 6-4 Tom Okker #11 Match data
Nov 10, 1975* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Hard Jimmy Connors #1 6-4 6-2 Tom Okker #9 Match data
Nov 21, 1974* London ATP 250 SF Carpet Jimmy Connors #1 6-0 6-2 Tom Okker #5 Match data
Dec 4, 1973 Masters ATP Finals RR Carpet Tom Okker #4 7-5 6-3 Jimmy Connors #3 Match data
Dec 2, 1973* Johannesburg ATP 250 SF Hard Jimmy Connors #3 6-3 6-3 4-6 6-4 Tom Okker #4 Match data
Sep 23, 1973* Los Angeles ATP 250 F Hard Jimmy Connors #10 7-5 7-6 Tom Okker #8 Match data
Sep 7, 1973* US Open Grand Slam R16 Grass Jimmy Connors #10 6-3 6-2 6-4 Tom Okker #9 Match data
Nov 7, 1972* Stockholm ATP 250 R32 Hard Tom Okker 6-2 1-6 6-3 Jimmy Connors Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109
Tom Okker #438 #3 0 2,198 672 279 70.7% 0 2 0 0 35 37

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Connors Tom Okker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6 — — — — — — —
20 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17 — — — — — — —
21 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32 — — — — — — —
22 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41 — — — — — — —
23 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53 — — — — — — —
24 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61 1968 89–23 79.5% — 1,796 0 7
25 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71 1969 86–25 77.5% — 2,009 0 15
26 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79 1970 59–27 68.6% — 1,948 0 20
27 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85 1971 74–31 70.5% — 2,007 0 22
28 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89 1972 69–31 69.0% — 2,041 0 23
29 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96 1973 91–23 79.8% #4 2,166 0 30
30 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100 1974 65–19 77.4% #6 2,061 0 33
31 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105 1975 39–13 75.0% #11 2,068 0 35
32 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105 1976 33–18 64.7% #23 1,956 0 35
33 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105 1977 15–13 53.6% #31 1,931 0 36
34 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105 1978 20–20 50.0% #50 1,879 0 36
35 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107 1979 20–18 52.6% #56 1,772 0 37
36 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109 1980 11–13 45.8% #107 1,715 0 37
37 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109 1981 1–5 16.7% #107 1,651 0 37
38 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109 — — — — — — —
39 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109 — — — — — — —
40 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109 — — — — — — —
41 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109 — — — — — — —
42 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109 — — — — — — —
43 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109 — — — — — — —