H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs Tomas Smid H2H: 6-0

Jimmy Connors holds a 6–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 5–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1984 Memphis fourth round 6-0 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors

USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H

6 – 0

6 main draw meetings

Tomas Smid

CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

Date	Tournament	Category	Round	Surface	Winner	Score	Loser	Match
Feb 10, 1984*	Memphis	ATP 250	R16	Carpet	Jimmy Connors #3	6-0 7-6	Tomas Smid #18	Match data
Jan 16, 1984*	Masters	ATP Finals	QF	Carpet	Jimmy Connors #3	6-4 2-6 6-2	Tomas Smid #17	Match data
Mar 27, 1982*	Milan	ATP 250	QF	Carpet	Jimmy Connors #2	4-6 6-4 6-2	Tomas Smid #22	Match data
Mar 18, 1982*	Rotterdam	ATP 250	QF	Carpet	Jimmy Connors #2	7-6 6-3	Tomas Smid #27	Match data
May 16, 1981*	Hamburg	ATP 250	QF	Clay	Jimmy Connors #3	2-6 6-3 6-2	Tomas Smid #21	Match data
Mar 1, 1979*	Memphis	ATP 250	R32	Carpet	Jimmy Connors #1	6-4 6-0	Tomas Smid #45	Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000	Finals	500	250	Titles
Jimmy Connors	#1,295	#1	875	2,410	1,262	294	81.1%	8	1	1	0	99	109
Tomas Smid	#975	#11	28	1,998	497	318	61.0%	0	0	0	0	10	10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Jimmy Connors							Tomas Smid
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1969	0–1	0.0%	—	1,480	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1970	5–4	55.6%	—	1,557	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1971	23–13	63.9%	—	1,769	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1972	76–25	75.2%	—	1,991	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1973	86–16	84.3%	#3	2,152	0	17	1976	5–7	41.7%	#154	1,542	0	0
21	1974	95–6	94.1%	#1	2,301	3	32	1977	16–18	47.1%	#67	1,637	0	0
22	1975	79–10	88.8%	#1	2,260	3	41	1978	36–25	59.0%	#36	1,799	0	1
23	1976	97–8	92.4%	#1	2,370	4	53	1979	50–25	66.7%	#27	1,870	0	2
24	1977	69–15	82.1%	#1	2,271	4	61	1980	45–21	68.2%	#23	1,950	0	4
25	1978	67–6	91.8%	#1	2,326	5	71	1981	54–28	65.9%	#28	1,864	0	5
26	1979	78–12	86.7%	#2	2,272	5	79	1982	62–28	68.9%	#24	1,901	0	7
27	1980	73–15	83.0%	#3	2,197	5	85	1983	59–30	66.3%	#17	1,902	0	9
28	1981	59–12	83.1%	#2	2,162	5	89	1984	46–27	63.0%	#16	1,840	0	9
29	1982	78–11	87.6%	#2	2,263	7	96	1985	47–27	63.5%	#19	1,804	0	10
30	1983	52–11	82.5%	#3	2,193	8	100	1986	28–24	53.8%	#54	1,721	0	10
31	1984	69–12	85.2%	#2	2,240	8	105	1987	30–26	53.6%	#31	1,729	0	10
32	1985	45–15	75.0%	#4	2,133	8	105	1988	17–23	42.5%	#115	1,656	0	10
33	1986	46–15	75.4%	#8	2,013	8	105	1989	2–9	18.2%	#453	1,537	0	10
34	1987	52–19	73.2%	#4	1,985	8	105	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1988	40–11	78.4%	#7	2,020	8	107	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1989	31–13	70.5%	#14	1,957	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1990	0–3	0.0%	#936	1,881	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	1991	19–14	57.6%	#49	1,887	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	1992	17–16	51.5%	#84	1,774	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
40	1993	3–5	37.5%	#370	1,717	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
41	1994	1–3	25.0%	#672	1,681	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
42	1995	2–2	50.0%	#419	1,673	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
43	1996	0–1	0.0%	#1300	1,665	8	109	—	—	—	—	—	—	—