H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jimmy Connors vs Van Winitsky H2H: 7-0

Jimmy Connors holds a 7–0 lead over Van Winitsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 4–0 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1983 Tokyo Indoor fourth round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Van Winitsky
USA Age 67 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 28, 1983* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jimmy Connors #3 6-3 6-1 Van Winitsky #90 Match data
Sep 16, 1983* Dallas ATP 250 R16 Hard Jimmy Connors #3 6-1 6-4 Van Winitsky #98 Match data
Apr 29, 1982* Las Vegas ATP 250 R16 Hard Jimmy Connors #2 6-1 6-2 Van Winitsky #41 Match data
Feb 26, 1982* Monterrey ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jimmy Connors #2 7-6 6-0 Van Winitsky #40 Match data
Aug 19, 1981* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jimmy Connors #3 6-1 6-3 Van Winitsky #79 Match data
Jan 24, 1979* Philadelphia ATP 250 R64 Carpet Jimmy Connors #1 6-4 6-3 Van Winitsky #132 Match data
Feb 24, 1978* Denver ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jimmy Connors #1 6-4 6-2 Van Winitsky #164 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109
Van Winitsky #834 #35 0 1,852 106 133 44.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jimmy Connors Van Winitsky
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1975 1–1 50.0% #282 1,505 0 0
17 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0 1976 1–2 33.3% #239 1,527 0 0
18 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0 1977 8–7 53.3% #169 1,648 0 0
19 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6 1978 15–25 37.5% #132 1,590 0 0
20 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17 1979 6–14 30.0% #141 1,579 0 0
21 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32 1980 14–17 45.2% #90 1,675 0 0
22 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41 1981 16–12 57.1% #47 1,717 0 1
23 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53 1982 28–23 54.9% #53 1,698 0 3
24 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61 1983 10–17 37.0% #91 1,646 0 3
25 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71 1984 7–14 33.3% #133 1,564 0 3
26 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79 1985 0–1 0.0% #331 1,551 0 3
27 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85 — — — — — — —
28 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89 — — — — — — —
29 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96 — — — — — — —
30 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100 — — — — — — —
31 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105 — — — — — — —
32 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105 — — — — — — —
33 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105 — — — — — — —
34 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105 — — — — — — —
35 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107 — — — — — — —
36 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109 — — — — — — —
37 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109 — — — — — — —
38 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109 — — — — — — —
39 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109 — — — — — — —
40 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109 — — — — — — —
41 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109 — — — — — — —
42 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109 — — — — — — —
43 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109 — — — — — — —